Comparison of the Williams Airway Intubator and Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway for fibreoptic orotracheal intubation

Greenland, K. B. ; Lam, M. C. ; Irwin, M. G.

Oxford, UK : Blackwell Science Ltd
Published 2004
ISSN:
1365-2044
Source:
Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
Topics:
Medicine
Notes:
A randomised study was carried out in 60 anaesthetised patients with no evidence of airway difficulties, to compare the Williams Airway Intubator and the Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway for bronchoscopic view and ease of railroading a tracheal tube during fibreoptic orotracheal intubation. The Williams Airway Intubator provided a better view of the glottis (41 (68.3%) unobstructed views) than the Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway (15 (25%) unobstructed views; p 〈 0.0001) and a shorter time was needed to complete bronchoscopy (median (95% CI) difference 4 s (1–7); p = 0.01). Four (6.7%) bronchoscopies failed using the Williams Airway Intubator compared with 26 (43.3%) using the Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway (p 〈 0.0001). Both airways provided similar intubating conditions when the glottis was visible.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
_version_ 1798290185441509378
autor Greenland, K. B.
Lam, M. C.
Irwin, M. G.
book_url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03527.x
datenlieferant nat_lic_papers
hauptsatz hsatz_simple
identnr NLZ242246753
insertion_date 2012-04-27
issn 1365-2044
journal_name Anaesthesia
materialart 1
notes A randomised study was carried out in 60 anaesthetised patients with no evidence of airway difficulties, to compare the Williams Airway Intubator and the Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway for bronchoscopic view and ease of railroading a tracheal tube during fibreoptic orotracheal intubation. The Williams Airway Intubator provided a better view of the glottis (41 (68.3%) unobstructed views) than the Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway (15 (25%) unobstructed views; p 〈 0.0001) and a shorter time was needed to complete bronchoscopy (median (95% CI) difference 4 s (1–7); p = 0.01). Four (6.7%) bronchoscopies failed using the Williams Airway Intubator compared with 26 (43.3%) using the Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway (p 〈 0.0001). Both airways provided similar intubating conditions when the glottis was visible.
package_name Blackwell Publishing
publikationsjahr_anzeige 2004
publikationsjahr_facette 2004
publikationsjahr_intervall 7999:2000-2004
publikationsjahr_sort 2004
publikationsort Oxford, UK
publisher Blackwell Science Ltd
reference 59 (2004), S. 0
search_space articles
shingle_author_1 Greenland, K. B.
Lam, M. C.
Irwin, M. G.
shingle_author_2 Greenland, K. B.
Lam, M. C.
Irwin, M. G.
shingle_author_3 Greenland, K. B.
Lam, M. C.
Irwin, M. G.
shingle_author_4 Greenland, K. B.
Lam, M. C.
Irwin, M. G.
shingle_catch_all_1 Greenland, K. B.
Lam, M. C.
Irwin, M. G.
Comparison of the Williams Airway Intubator and Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway for fibreoptic orotracheal intubation
Blackwell Science Ltd
A randomised study was carried out in 60 anaesthetised patients with no evidence of airway difficulties, to compare the Williams Airway Intubator and the Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway for bronchoscopic view and ease of railroading a tracheal tube during fibreoptic orotracheal intubation. The Williams Airway Intubator provided a better view of the glottis (41 (68.3%) unobstructed views) than the Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway (15 (25%) unobstructed views; p 〈 0.0001) and a shorter time was needed to complete bronchoscopy (median (95% CI) difference 4 s (1–7); p = 0.01). Four (6.7%) bronchoscopies failed using the Williams Airway Intubator compared with 26 (43.3%) using the Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway (p 〈 0.0001). Both airways provided similar intubating conditions when the glottis was visible.
1365-2044
13652044
shingle_catch_all_2 Greenland, K. B.
Lam, M. C.
Irwin, M. G.
Comparison of the Williams Airway Intubator and Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway for fibreoptic orotracheal intubation
Blackwell Science Ltd
A randomised study was carried out in 60 anaesthetised patients with no evidence of airway difficulties, to compare the Williams Airway Intubator and the Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway for bronchoscopic view and ease of railroading a tracheal tube during fibreoptic orotracheal intubation. The Williams Airway Intubator provided a better view of the glottis (41 (68.3%) unobstructed views) than the Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway (15 (25%) unobstructed views; p 〈 0.0001) and a shorter time was needed to complete bronchoscopy (median (95% CI) difference 4 s (1–7); p = 0.01). Four (6.7%) bronchoscopies failed using the Williams Airway Intubator compared with 26 (43.3%) using the Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway (p 〈 0.0001). Both airways provided similar intubating conditions when the glottis was visible.
1365-2044
13652044
shingle_catch_all_3 Greenland, K. B.
Lam, M. C.
Irwin, M. G.
Comparison of the Williams Airway Intubator and Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway for fibreoptic orotracheal intubation
Blackwell Science Ltd
A randomised study was carried out in 60 anaesthetised patients with no evidence of airway difficulties, to compare the Williams Airway Intubator and the Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway for bronchoscopic view and ease of railroading a tracheal tube during fibreoptic orotracheal intubation. The Williams Airway Intubator provided a better view of the glottis (41 (68.3%) unobstructed views) than the Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway (15 (25%) unobstructed views; p 〈 0.0001) and a shorter time was needed to complete bronchoscopy (median (95% CI) difference 4 s (1–7); p = 0.01). Four (6.7%) bronchoscopies failed using the Williams Airway Intubator compared with 26 (43.3%) using the Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway (p 〈 0.0001). Both airways provided similar intubating conditions when the glottis was visible.
1365-2044
13652044
shingle_catch_all_4 Greenland, K. B.
Lam, M. C.
Irwin, M. G.
Comparison of the Williams Airway Intubator and Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway for fibreoptic orotracheal intubation
Blackwell Science Ltd
A randomised study was carried out in 60 anaesthetised patients with no evidence of airway difficulties, to compare the Williams Airway Intubator and the Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway for bronchoscopic view and ease of railroading a tracheal tube during fibreoptic orotracheal intubation. The Williams Airway Intubator provided a better view of the glottis (41 (68.3%) unobstructed views) than the Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway (15 (25%) unobstructed views; p 〈 0.0001) and a shorter time was needed to complete bronchoscopy (median (95% CI) difference 4 s (1–7); p = 0.01). Four (6.7%) bronchoscopies failed using the Williams Airway Intubator compared with 26 (43.3%) using the Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway (p 〈 0.0001). Both airways provided similar intubating conditions when the glottis was visible.
1365-2044
13652044
shingle_title_1 Comparison of the Williams Airway Intubator and Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway for fibreoptic orotracheal intubation
shingle_title_2 Comparison of the Williams Airway Intubator and Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway for fibreoptic orotracheal intubation
shingle_title_3 Comparison of the Williams Airway Intubator and Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway for fibreoptic orotracheal intubation
shingle_title_4 Comparison of the Williams Airway Intubator and Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway for fibreoptic orotracheal intubation
sigel_instance_filter dkfz
geomar
wilbert
ipn
albert
source_archive Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
timestamp 2024-05-06T08:12:42.995Z
titel Comparison of the Williams Airway Intubator and Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway for fibreoptic orotracheal intubation
titel_suche Comparison of the Williams Airway Intubator and Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway for fibreoptic orotracheal intubation
topic WW-YZ
uid nat_lic_papers_NLZ242246753