Comparison of ‘Pseudobranch’ type and ‘Chloride’ type cells in the pseudobranch of marine, freshwater and euryhaline teleosts
| ISSN: |
1095-8649
|
|---|---|
| Source: |
Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
|
| Topics: |
Biology
|
| Notes: |
The degree of similarity between the ‘pseudobranch type’ and ‘chloride type’ cells in the pseudobranch of bass (Dicentrachus labrax (L)), smelt (Osmerus esperlangus) and rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) was studied. The pseudobranch of bass and smelt contains two specialised cell types commonly known as ‘chloride type’ and ‘pseudobranch type’ cells, whereas rainbow trout only possess the latter type. ‘Pseudobranch type’ cells are characterised by the orderly arrangement of parallel tubules around their closely packed mitochondria. ‘Chloride type’ cells are identified by their highly branched tubular network, randomly distributed mitochondria, and the presence of an apical pit. Although ultra-structural changes were noted under osmotic stress, the ‘chloride type’ and ‘pseudobranch type’ cells remained distinguishable from each other and gave no reason to suggest that they were different forms of the same cell type. It was concluded that the two are distinct cell types, performing different, though possibly related, functions.
|
| Type of Medium: |
Electronic Resource
|
| URL: |
| _version_ | 1798290403918610432 |
|---|---|
| autor | Mattey, D. L. Moate, R. Morgan, M. |
| book_url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1978.tb03465.x |
| datenlieferant | nat_lic_papers |
| hauptsatz | hsatz_simple |
| identnr | NLZ240624335 |
| insertion_date | 2012-04-26 |
| issn | 1095-8649 |
| journal_name | Journal of fish biology |
| materialart | 1 |
| notes | The degree of similarity between the ‘pseudobranch type’ and ‘chloride type’ cells in the pseudobranch of bass (Dicentrachus labrax (L)), smelt (Osmerus esperlangus) and rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) was studied. The pseudobranch of bass and smelt contains two specialised cell types commonly known as ‘chloride type’ and ‘pseudobranch type’ cells, whereas rainbow trout only possess the latter type. ‘Pseudobranch type’ cells are characterised by the orderly arrangement of parallel tubules around their closely packed mitochondria. ‘Chloride type’ cells are identified by their highly branched tubular network, randomly distributed mitochondria, and the presence of an apical pit. Although ultra-structural changes were noted under osmotic stress, the ‘chloride type’ and ‘pseudobranch type’ cells remained distinguishable from each other and gave no reason to suggest that they were different forms of the same cell type. It was concluded that the two are distinct cell types, performing different, though possibly related, functions. |
| package_name | Blackwell Publishing |
| publikationsjahr_anzeige | 1978 |
| publikationsjahr_facette | 1978 |
| publikationsjahr_intervall | 8024:1975-1979 |
| publikationsjahr_sort | 1978 |
| publikationsort | Oxford, UK |
| publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| reference | 13 (1978), S. 0 |
| search_space | articles |
| shingle_author_1 | Mattey, D. L. Moate, R. Morgan, M. |
| shingle_author_2 | Mattey, D. L. Moate, R. Morgan, M. |
| shingle_author_3 | Mattey, D. L. Moate, R. Morgan, M. |
| shingle_author_4 | Mattey, D. L. Moate, R. Morgan, M. |
| shingle_catch_all_1 | Mattey, D. L. Moate, R. Morgan, M. Comparison of ‘Pseudobranch’ type and ‘Chloride’ type cells in the pseudobranch of marine, freshwater and euryhaline teleosts Blackwell Publishing Ltd The degree of similarity between the ‘pseudobranch type’ and ‘chloride type’ cells in the pseudobranch of bass (Dicentrachus labrax (L)), smelt (Osmerus esperlangus) and rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) was studied. The pseudobranch of bass and smelt contains two specialised cell types commonly known as ‘chloride type’ and ‘pseudobranch type’ cells, whereas rainbow trout only possess the latter type. ‘Pseudobranch type’ cells are characterised by the orderly arrangement of parallel tubules around their closely packed mitochondria. ‘Chloride type’ cells are identified by their highly branched tubular network, randomly distributed mitochondria, and the presence of an apical pit. Although ultra-structural changes were noted under osmotic stress, the ‘chloride type’ and ‘pseudobranch type’ cells remained distinguishable from each other and gave no reason to suggest that they were different forms of the same cell type. It was concluded that the two are distinct cell types, performing different, though possibly related, functions. 1095-8649 10958649 |
| shingle_catch_all_2 | Mattey, D. L. Moate, R. Morgan, M. Comparison of ‘Pseudobranch’ type and ‘Chloride’ type cells in the pseudobranch of marine, freshwater and euryhaline teleosts Blackwell Publishing Ltd The degree of similarity between the ‘pseudobranch type’ and ‘chloride type’ cells in the pseudobranch of bass (Dicentrachus labrax (L)), smelt (Osmerus esperlangus) and rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) was studied. The pseudobranch of bass and smelt contains two specialised cell types commonly known as ‘chloride type’ and ‘pseudobranch type’ cells, whereas rainbow trout only possess the latter type. ‘Pseudobranch type’ cells are characterised by the orderly arrangement of parallel tubules around their closely packed mitochondria. ‘Chloride type’ cells are identified by their highly branched tubular network, randomly distributed mitochondria, and the presence of an apical pit. Although ultra-structural changes were noted under osmotic stress, the ‘chloride type’ and ‘pseudobranch type’ cells remained distinguishable from each other and gave no reason to suggest that they were different forms of the same cell type. It was concluded that the two are distinct cell types, performing different, though possibly related, functions. 1095-8649 10958649 |
| shingle_catch_all_3 | Mattey, D. L. Moate, R. Morgan, M. Comparison of ‘Pseudobranch’ type and ‘Chloride’ type cells in the pseudobranch of marine, freshwater and euryhaline teleosts Blackwell Publishing Ltd The degree of similarity between the ‘pseudobranch type’ and ‘chloride type’ cells in the pseudobranch of bass (Dicentrachus labrax (L)), smelt (Osmerus esperlangus) and rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) was studied. The pseudobranch of bass and smelt contains two specialised cell types commonly known as ‘chloride type’ and ‘pseudobranch type’ cells, whereas rainbow trout only possess the latter type. ‘Pseudobranch type’ cells are characterised by the orderly arrangement of parallel tubules around their closely packed mitochondria. ‘Chloride type’ cells are identified by their highly branched tubular network, randomly distributed mitochondria, and the presence of an apical pit. Although ultra-structural changes were noted under osmotic stress, the ‘chloride type’ and ‘pseudobranch type’ cells remained distinguishable from each other and gave no reason to suggest that they were different forms of the same cell type. It was concluded that the two are distinct cell types, performing different, though possibly related, functions. 1095-8649 10958649 |
| shingle_catch_all_4 | Mattey, D. L. Moate, R. Morgan, M. Comparison of ‘Pseudobranch’ type and ‘Chloride’ type cells in the pseudobranch of marine, freshwater and euryhaline teleosts Blackwell Publishing Ltd The degree of similarity between the ‘pseudobranch type’ and ‘chloride type’ cells in the pseudobranch of bass (Dicentrachus labrax (L)), smelt (Osmerus esperlangus) and rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) was studied. The pseudobranch of bass and smelt contains two specialised cell types commonly known as ‘chloride type’ and ‘pseudobranch type’ cells, whereas rainbow trout only possess the latter type. ‘Pseudobranch type’ cells are characterised by the orderly arrangement of parallel tubules around their closely packed mitochondria. ‘Chloride type’ cells are identified by their highly branched tubular network, randomly distributed mitochondria, and the presence of an apical pit. Although ultra-structural changes were noted under osmotic stress, the ‘chloride type’ and ‘pseudobranch type’ cells remained distinguishable from each other and gave no reason to suggest that they were different forms of the same cell type. It was concluded that the two are distinct cell types, performing different, though possibly related, functions. 1095-8649 10958649 |
| shingle_title_1 | Comparison of ‘Pseudobranch’ type and ‘Chloride’ type cells in the pseudobranch of marine, freshwater and euryhaline teleosts |
| shingle_title_2 | Comparison of ‘Pseudobranch’ type and ‘Chloride’ type cells in the pseudobranch of marine, freshwater and euryhaline teleosts |
| shingle_title_3 | Comparison of ‘Pseudobranch’ type and ‘Chloride’ type cells in the pseudobranch of marine, freshwater and euryhaline teleosts |
| shingle_title_4 | Comparison of ‘Pseudobranch’ type and ‘Chloride’ type cells in the pseudobranch of marine, freshwater and euryhaline teleosts |
| sigel_instance_filter | dkfz geomar wilbert ipn albert |
| source_archive | Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
| timestamp | 2024-05-06T08:16:11.515Z |
| titel | Comparison of ‘Pseudobranch’ type and ‘Chloride’ type cells in the pseudobranch of marine, freshwater and euryhaline teleosts |
| titel_suche | Comparison of ‘Pseudobranch’ type and ‘Chloride’ type cells in the pseudobranch of marine, freshwater and euryhaline teleosts |
| topic | W |
| uid | nat_lic_papers_NLZ240624335 |