Central place foraging: a reappraisal of the 'loading effect'
| ISSN: |
0003-3472
|
|---|---|
| Source: |
Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002
|
| Topics: |
Biology
|
| Type of Medium: |
Electronic Resource
|
| URL: |
| _version_ | 1798292167293140992 |
|---|---|
| autor | Cuthill, I. Kacelnik, A. |
| autorsonst | Cuthill, I. Kacelnik, A. |
| book_url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80175-7 |
| datenlieferant | nat_lic_papers |
| fussnote | Animals that provision a central place usually bring back larger loads when foraging far from home. This positive correlation between average load size and distance is typically explained as rate-maximizing behaviour in the face of a trade-off between travel costs and a decelerating rate of prey gain in food patches (the 'loading effect'). By using feeders to provide wild parent starlings, Sturnus vulgaris, with constant rates of prey loading, a positive load-distance correlation was shown to exist in the absence of a loading effect (experiment I). However, in a laboratory simulation where no load was transported (experiment II). the average number of prey eaten in patch visits by self-feeding starlings was invariant with travel distance, so the explanation of the load-distance correlation in experiment I must lie in featues peculiar to central place foraging. Bottlenecks in ingestion by chicks and interruption by visual detection of nest disturbance (experiment III) were rejected as causes of the correlation. Risks of dropping prey in flight appeared low, but the risk of kleptoparasitism received weak support. The travel-load size correlation may be an adaptive response to load transport costs, as return travel times increased with the load size being carried (experiment IV). |
| hauptsatz | hsatz_simple |
| identnr | NLZ185161502 |
| issn | 0003-3472 |
| journal_name | Animal Behaviour |
| materialart | 1 |
| package_name | Elsevier |
| publikationsort | Amsterdam |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| reference | 40 (1990), S. 1087-1101 |
| search_space | articles |
| shingle_author_1 | Cuthill, I. Kacelnik, A. |
| shingle_author_2 | Cuthill, I. Kacelnik, A. |
| shingle_author_3 | Cuthill, I. Kacelnik, A. |
| shingle_author_4 | Cuthill, I. Kacelnik, A. |
| shingle_catch_all_1 | Cuthill, I. Kacelnik, A. Central place foraging: a reappraisal of the 'loading effect' 0003-3472 00033472 Elsevier |
| shingle_catch_all_2 | Cuthill, I. Kacelnik, A. Central place foraging: a reappraisal of the 'loading effect' 0003-3472 00033472 Elsevier |
| shingle_catch_all_3 | Cuthill, I. Kacelnik, A. Central place foraging: a reappraisal of the 'loading effect' 0003-3472 00033472 Elsevier |
| shingle_catch_all_4 | Cuthill, I. Kacelnik, A. Central place foraging: a reappraisal of the 'loading effect' 0003-3472 00033472 Elsevier |
| shingle_title_1 | Central place foraging: a reappraisal of the 'loading effect' |
| shingle_title_2 | Central place foraging: a reappraisal of the 'loading effect' |
| shingle_title_3 | Central place foraging: a reappraisal of the 'loading effect' |
| shingle_title_4 | Central place foraging: a reappraisal of the 'loading effect' |
| sigel_instance_filter | dkfz geomar wilbert ipn albert fhp |
| source_archive | Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 |
| timestamp | 2024-05-06T08:44:12.962Z |
| titel | Central place foraging: a reappraisal of the 'loading effect' |
| titel_suche | Central place foraging: a reappraisal of the 'loading effect' Animals that provision a central place usually bring back larger loads when foraging far from home. This positive correlation between average load size and distance is typically explained as rate-maximizing behaviour in the face of a trade-off between travel costs and a decelerating rate of prey gain in food patches (the 'loading effect'). By using feeders to provide wild parent starlings, Sturnus vulgaris, with constant rates of prey loading, a positive load-distance correlation was shown to exist in the absence of a loading effect (experiment I). However, in a laboratory simulation where no load was transported (experiment II). the average number of prey eaten in patch visits by self-feeding starlings was invariant with travel distance, so the explanation of the load-distance correlation in experiment I must lie in featues peculiar to central place foraging. Bottlenecks in ingestion by chicks and interruption by visual detection of nest disturbance (experiment III) were rejected as causes of the correlation. Risks of dropping prey in flight appeared low, but the risk of kleptoparasitism received weak support. The travel-load size correlation may be an adaptive response to load transport costs, as return travel times increased with the load size being carried (experiment IV). |
| topic | W |
| uid | nat_lic_papers_NLZ185161502 |