The qualitative comparative analysis of the visual field using computer assisted, semi-automated and manual instrumentation: II Statistical analysis
Wild, J. M. ; Flanagan, J. G. ; Barnes, D. A. ; Gilmartin, B. A. ; Good, P. A. ; Crews, S. J.
Springer
Published 1984
Springer
Published 1984
| ISSN: |
1573-2622
|
|---|---|
| Source: |
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
|
| Topics: |
Medicine
|
| Notes: |
Abstract A comparative evaluation of the Octopus automated perimeter (Programmes 21 and 31), the Goldmann Bowl perimeter, the Bjerrum Screen and the Friedmann VFAs Mk I and Mk II was carried out on a heterogenous sample of 75 patients. The results for the sample as a whole were analysed statistically in terms of the scoring system developed by Flanagan, Wild, Barnes, Gilmartin, Good and Crews (1984a). Statistically significant differences between the instruments were found at each of the 4 levels of analysis.
|
| Type of Medium: |
Electronic Resource
|
| URL: |