Semantic heuristics, syntactic analysis, and case-role assignment
| ISSN: |
1573-6555
|
|---|---|
| Source: |
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
|
| Topics: |
Psychology
|
| Notes: |
Abstract Forster's (1979) proposals regarding the autonomy of syntax and his explanation of experiments that support the alternative interactive theory of syntactic analysis are briefly reviewed. It is argued that a slightly different account is consistent with evidence from neuropsychology. On the basis of the work of Linebarger, Schwartz, and Saffran (1983) with agrammatics, a distinction is drawn between a sentence's syntactic representation and its propositional representation. The suggestion is that the processor responsible for assigning case roles within a proposition has access to semantic and pragmatic information as well as to a purely syntatic representation. In this way, certain top-down effects in sentence processing can be comfortably accommodated without violating the autonomy of the syntactic representation.
|
| Type of Medium: |
Electronic Resource
|
| URL: |
| _version_ | 1798296840827830273 |
|---|---|
| autor | Hanley, J. Richard |
| autorsonst | Hanley, J. Richard |
| book_url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01069286 |
| datenlieferant | nat_lic_papers |
| hauptsatz | hsatz_simple |
| identnr | NLM197828337 |
| iqvoc_descriptor_title | iqvoc_00000708:analysis |
| issn | 1573-6555 |
| journal_name | Journal of psycholinguistic research |
| materialart | 1 |
| notes | Abstract Forster's (1979) proposals regarding the autonomy of syntax and his explanation of experiments that support the alternative interactive theory of syntactic analysis are briefly reviewed. It is argued that a slightly different account is consistent with evidence from neuropsychology. On the basis of the work of Linebarger, Schwartz, and Saffran (1983) with agrammatics, a distinction is drawn between a sentence's syntactic representation and its propositional representation. The suggestion is that the processor responsible for assigning case roles within a proposition has access to semantic and pragmatic information as well as to a purely syntatic representation. In this way, certain top-down effects in sentence processing can be comfortably accommodated without violating the autonomy of the syntactic representation. |
| package_name | Springer |
| publikationsjahr_anzeige | 1987 |
| publikationsjahr_facette | 1987 |
| publikationsjahr_intervall | 8014:1985-1989 |
| publikationsjahr_sort | 1987 |
| publisher | Springer |
| reference | 16 (1987), S. 329-334 |
| search_space | articles |
| shingle_author_1 | Hanley, J. Richard |
| shingle_author_2 | Hanley, J. Richard |
| shingle_author_3 | Hanley, J. Richard |
| shingle_author_4 | Hanley, J. Richard |
| shingle_catch_all_1 | Hanley, J. Richard Semantic heuristics, syntactic analysis, and case-role assignment Abstract Forster's (1979) proposals regarding the autonomy of syntax and his explanation of experiments that support the alternative interactive theory of syntactic analysis are briefly reviewed. It is argued that a slightly different account is consistent with evidence from neuropsychology. On the basis of the work of Linebarger, Schwartz, and Saffran (1983) with agrammatics, a distinction is drawn between a sentence's syntactic representation and its propositional representation. The suggestion is that the processor responsible for assigning case roles within a proposition has access to semantic and pragmatic information as well as to a purely syntatic representation. In this way, certain top-down effects in sentence processing can be comfortably accommodated without violating the autonomy of the syntactic representation. 1573-6555 15736555 Springer |
| shingle_catch_all_2 | Hanley, J. Richard Semantic heuristics, syntactic analysis, and case-role assignment Abstract Forster's (1979) proposals regarding the autonomy of syntax and his explanation of experiments that support the alternative interactive theory of syntactic analysis are briefly reviewed. It is argued that a slightly different account is consistent with evidence from neuropsychology. On the basis of the work of Linebarger, Schwartz, and Saffran (1983) with agrammatics, a distinction is drawn between a sentence's syntactic representation and its propositional representation. The suggestion is that the processor responsible for assigning case roles within a proposition has access to semantic and pragmatic information as well as to a purely syntatic representation. In this way, certain top-down effects in sentence processing can be comfortably accommodated without violating the autonomy of the syntactic representation. 1573-6555 15736555 Springer |
| shingle_catch_all_3 | Hanley, J. Richard Semantic heuristics, syntactic analysis, and case-role assignment Abstract Forster's (1979) proposals regarding the autonomy of syntax and his explanation of experiments that support the alternative interactive theory of syntactic analysis are briefly reviewed. It is argued that a slightly different account is consistent with evidence from neuropsychology. On the basis of the work of Linebarger, Schwartz, and Saffran (1983) with agrammatics, a distinction is drawn between a sentence's syntactic representation and its propositional representation. The suggestion is that the processor responsible for assigning case roles within a proposition has access to semantic and pragmatic information as well as to a purely syntatic representation. In this way, certain top-down effects in sentence processing can be comfortably accommodated without violating the autonomy of the syntactic representation. 1573-6555 15736555 Springer |
| shingle_catch_all_4 | Hanley, J. Richard Semantic heuristics, syntactic analysis, and case-role assignment Abstract Forster's (1979) proposals regarding the autonomy of syntax and his explanation of experiments that support the alternative interactive theory of syntactic analysis are briefly reviewed. It is argued that a slightly different account is consistent with evidence from neuropsychology. On the basis of the work of Linebarger, Schwartz, and Saffran (1983) with agrammatics, a distinction is drawn between a sentence's syntactic representation and its propositional representation. The suggestion is that the processor responsible for assigning case roles within a proposition has access to semantic and pragmatic information as well as to a purely syntatic representation. In this way, certain top-down effects in sentence processing can be comfortably accommodated without violating the autonomy of the syntactic representation. 1573-6555 15736555 Springer |
| shingle_title_1 | Semantic heuristics, syntactic analysis, and case-role assignment |
| shingle_title_2 | Semantic heuristics, syntactic analysis, and case-role assignment |
| shingle_title_3 | Semantic heuristics, syntactic analysis, and case-role assignment |
| shingle_title_4 | Semantic heuristics, syntactic analysis, and case-role assignment |
| sigel_instance_filter | dkfz geomar wilbert ipn albert fhp |
| source_archive | Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000 |
| timestamp | 2024-05-06T09:58:30.201Z |
| titel | Semantic heuristics, syntactic analysis, and case-role assignment |
| titel_suche | Semantic heuristics, syntactic analysis, and case-role assignment |
| topic | CL-CZ |
| uid | nat_lic_papers_NLM197828337 |