Surfactant Enhanced Desorption of TNT from Soil
Taha, M. Raihan ; Soewarto, I. Henry ; Acar, Yalcin B. ; Gale, Robert J. ; Zappi, Mark E.
Springer
Published 1997
Springer
Published 1997
| ISSN: |
1573-2932
|
|---|---|
| Keywords: |
decontamination ; desorption ; explosive ; soil contamination ; surfactant ; 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene ; TNT
|
| Source: |
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
|
| Topics: |
Energy, Environment Protection, Nuclear Power Engineering
|
| Notes: |
Abstract Surfactant enhanced desorption of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) from contaminated soils at a military site was investigated. Anionic (SDS and DOWFAX 8390), cationic (CTAC and CTAB), and nonionic (Tween 80 and Brij 35) surfactants were first tested at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1%. The anionic and nonionic surfactants were further tested at concentrations of up to 10%. Anionic surfactants, particularly SDS, provided the best desorption of TNT from the soil. There was not any increase in TNT desorption for both the nonionics and cationics at concentrations ranging between 0.1 to 1% and the extent of desorption was found to be lower than the TNT desorption only by water. The competition of the negatively charged soil surfaces for the positively charged cationics and the neutral nonionic surfactants may constitute the underlying reason. TNT was significantly desorbed when the concentrations of Tween 80, DOWFAX 80 and SDS were increased up to 10%.
|
| Type of Medium: |
Electronic Resource
|
| URL: |
| _version_ | 1798296689899995138 |
|---|---|
| autor | Taha, M. Raihan Soewarto, I. Henry Acar, Yalcin B. Gale, Robert J. Zappi, Mark E. |
| autorsonst | Taha, M. Raihan Soewarto, I. Henry Acar, Yalcin B. Gale, Robert J. Zappi, Mark E. |
| book_url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018362209270 |
| datenlieferant | nat_lic_papers |
| hauptsatz | hsatz_simple |
| identnr | NLM19618195X |
| issn | 1573-2932 |
| journal_name | Water, air & soil pollution |
| materialart | 1 |
| notes | Abstract Surfactant enhanced desorption of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) from contaminated soils at a military site was investigated. Anionic (SDS and DOWFAX 8390), cationic (CTAC and CTAB), and nonionic (Tween 80 and Brij 35) surfactants were first tested at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1%. The anionic and nonionic surfactants were further tested at concentrations of up to 10%. Anionic surfactants, particularly SDS, provided the best desorption of TNT from the soil. There was not any increase in TNT desorption for both the nonionics and cationics at concentrations ranging between 0.1 to 1% and the extent of desorption was found to be lower than the TNT desorption only by water. The competition of the negatively charged soil surfaces for the positively charged cationics and the neutral nonionic surfactants may constitute the underlying reason. TNT was significantly desorbed when the concentrations of Tween 80, DOWFAX 80 and SDS were increased up to 10%. |
| package_name | Springer |
| publikationsjahr_anzeige | 1997 |
| publikationsjahr_facette | 1997 |
| publikationsjahr_intervall | 8004:1995-1999 |
| publikationsjahr_sort | 1997 |
| publisher | Springer |
| reference | 100 (1997), S. 33-48 |
| schlagwort | decontamination desorption explosive soil contamination surfactant 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene TNT |
| search_space | articles |
| shingle_author_1 | Taha, M. Raihan Soewarto, I. Henry Acar, Yalcin B. Gale, Robert J. Zappi, Mark E. |
| shingle_author_2 | Taha, M. Raihan Soewarto, I. Henry Acar, Yalcin B. Gale, Robert J. Zappi, Mark E. |
| shingle_author_3 | Taha, M. Raihan Soewarto, I. Henry Acar, Yalcin B. Gale, Robert J. Zappi, Mark E. |
| shingle_author_4 | Taha, M. Raihan Soewarto, I. Henry Acar, Yalcin B. Gale, Robert J. Zappi, Mark E. |
| shingle_catch_all_1 | Taha, M. Raihan Soewarto, I. Henry Acar, Yalcin B. Gale, Robert J. Zappi, Mark E. Surfactant Enhanced Desorption of TNT from Soil decontamination desorption explosive soil contamination surfactant 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene TNT decontamination desorption explosive soil contamination surfactant 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene TNT Abstract Surfactant enhanced desorption of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) from contaminated soils at a military site was investigated. Anionic (SDS and DOWFAX 8390), cationic (CTAC and CTAB), and nonionic (Tween 80 and Brij 35) surfactants were first tested at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1%. The anionic and nonionic surfactants were further tested at concentrations of up to 10%. Anionic surfactants, particularly SDS, provided the best desorption of TNT from the soil. There was not any increase in TNT desorption for both the nonionics and cationics at concentrations ranging between 0.1 to 1% and the extent of desorption was found to be lower than the TNT desorption only by water. The competition of the negatively charged soil surfaces for the positively charged cationics and the neutral nonionic surfactants may constitute the underlying reason. TNT was significantly desorbed when the concentrations of Tween 80, DOWFAX 80 and SDS were increased up to 10%. 1573-2932 15732932 Springer |
| shingle_catch_all_2 | Taha, M. Raihan Soewarto, I. Henry Acar, Yalcin B. Gale, Robert J. Zappi, Mark E. Surfactant Enhanced Desorption of TNT from Soil decontamination desorption explosive soil contamination surfactant 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene TNT decontamination desorption explosive soil contamination surfactant 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene TNT Abstract Surfactant enhanced desorption of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) from contaminated soils at a military site was investigated. Anionic (SDS and DOWFAX 8390), cationic (CTAC and CTAB), and nonionic (Tween 80 and Brij 35) surfactants were first tested at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1%. The anionic and nonionic surfactants were further tested at concentrations of up to 10%. Anionic surfactants, particularly SDS, provided the best desorption of TNT from the soil. There was not any increase in TNT desorption for both the nonionics and cationics at concentrations ranging between 0.1 to 1% and the extent of desorption was found to be lower than the TNT desorption only by water. The competition of the negatively charged soil surfaces for the positively charged cationics and the neutral nonionic surfactants may constitute the underlying reason. TNT was significantly desorbed when the concentrations of Tween 80, DOWFAX 80 and SDS were increased up to 10%. 1573-2932 15732932 Springer |
| shingle_catch_all_3 | Taha, M. Raihan Soewarto, I. Henry Acar, Yalcin B. Gale, Robert J. Zappi, Mark E. Surfactant Enhanced Desorption of TNT from Soil decontamination desorption explosive soil contamination surfactant 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene TNT decontamination desorption explosive soil contamination surfactant 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene TNT Abstract Surfactant enhanced desorption of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) from contaminated soils at a military site was investigated. Anionic (SDS and DOWFAX 8390), cationic (CTAC and CTAB), and nonionic (Tween 80 and Brij 35) surfactants were first tested at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1%. The anionic and nonionic surfactants were further tested at concentrations of up to 10%. Anionic surfactants, particularly SDS, provided the best desorption of TNT from the soil. There was not any increase in TNT desorption for both the nonionics and cationics at concentrations ranging between 0.1 to 1% and the extent of desorption was found to be lower than the TNT desorption only by water. The competition of the negatively charged soil surfaces for the positively charged cationics and the neutral nonionic surfactants may constitute the underlying reason. TNT was significantly desorbed when the concentrations of Tween 80, DOWFAX 80 and SDS were increased up to 10%. 1573-2932 15732932 Springer |
| shingle_catch_all_4 | Taha, M. Raihan Soewarto, I. Henry Acar, Yalcin B. Gale, Robert J. Zappi, Mark E. Surfactant Enhanced Desorption of TNT from Soil decontamination desorption explosive soil contamination surfactant 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene TNT decontamination desorption explosive soil contamination surfactant 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene TNT Abstract Surfactant enhanced desorption of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) from contaminated soils at a military site was investigated. Anionic (SDS and DOWFAX 8390), cationic (CTAC and CTAB), and nonionic (Tween 80 and Brij 35) surfactants were first tested at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1%. The anionic and nonionic surfactants were further tested at concentrations of up to 10%. Anionic surfactants, particularly SDS, provided the best desorption of TNT from the soil. There was not any increase in TNT desorption for both the nonionics and cationics at concentrations ranging between 0.1 to 1% and the extent of desorption was found to be lower than the TNT desorption only by water. The competition of the negatively charged soil surfaces for the positively charged cationics and the neutral nonionic surfactants may constitute the underlying reason. TNT was significantly desorbed when the concentrations of Tween 80, DOWFAX 80 and SDS were increased up to 10%. 1573-2932 15732932 Springer |
| shingle_title_1 | Surfactant Enhanced Desorption of TNT from Soil |
| shingle_title_2 | Surfactant Enhanced Desorption of TNT from Soil |
| shingle_title_3 | Surfactant Enhanced Desorption of TNT from Soil |
| shingle_title_4 | Surfactant Enhanced Desorption of TNT from Soil |
| sigel_instance_filter | dkfz geomar wilbert ipn albert fhp |
| source_archive | Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000 |
| timestamp | 2024-05-06T09:56:06.113Z |
| titel | Surfactant Enhanced Desorption of TNT from Soil |
| titel_suche | Surfactant Enhanced Desorption of TNT from Soil |
| topic | ZP |
| uid | nat_lic_papers_NLM19618195X |