A comparison of unweighted and fluctuation-weighted indices (within the central 28° of glaucomatous visual fields measured with the Octopus automated perimeter)

Funkhouser, A. T. ; Fankhauser, F.
Springer
Published 1991
ISSN:
1573-2630
Keywords:
visual field index ; Octopus ; Humphrey ; automated perimetry ; fluctuation-weighting
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Medicine
Notes:
Abstract The main visual field indices of Flammer and the analogous ones of Heijl have been compared based on a population of 113 glaucomatous visual fields. It is shown that for the population studied, the differences between the two sets of indices are negligible for Octopus G1 program results and that they may thus be used interchangeably.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
_version_ 1798296653770260480
autor Funkhouser, A. T.
Fankhauser, F.
autorsonst Funkhouser, A. T.
Fankhauser, F.
book_url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00128955
datenlieferant nat_lic_papers
hauptsatz hsatz_simple
identnr NLM194443671
issn 1573-2630
journal_name International ophthalmology
materialart 1
notes Abstract The main visual field indices of Flammer and the analogous ones of Heijl have been compared based on a population of 113 glaucomatous visual fields. It is shown that for the population studied, the differences between the two sets of indices are negligible for Octopus G1 program results and that they may thus be used interchangeably.
package_name Springer
publikationsjahr_anzeige 1991
publikationsjahr_facette 1991
publikationsjahr_intervall 8009:1990-1994
publikationsjahr_sort 1991
publisher Springer
reference 15 (1991), S. 347-351
schlagwort visual field index
Octopus
Humphrey
automated perimetry
fluctuation-weighting
search_space articles
shingle_author_1 Funkhouser, A. T.
Fankhauser, F.
shingle_author_2 Funkhouser, A. T.
Fankhauser, F.
shingle_author_3 Funkhouser, A. T.
Fankhauser, F.
shingle_author_4 Funkhouser, A. T.
Fankhauser, F.
shingle_catch_all_1 Funkhouser, A. T.
Fankhauser, F.
A comparison of unweighted and fluctuation-weighted indices (within the central 28° of glaucomatous visual fields measured with the Octopus automated perimeter)
visual field index
Octopus
Humphrey
automated perimetry
fluctuation-weighting
visual field index
Octopus
Humphrey
automated perimetry
fluctuation-weighting
Abstract The main visual field indices of Flammer and the analogous ones of Heijl have been compared based on a population of 113 glaucomatous visual fields. It is shown that for the population studied, the differences between the two sets of indices are negligible for Octopus G1 program results and that they may thus be used interchangeably.
1573-2630
15732630
Springer
shingle_catch_all_2 Funkhouser, A. T.
Fankhauser, F.
A comparison of unweighted and fluctuation-weighted indices (within the central 28° of glaucomatous visual fields measured with the Octopus automated perimeter)
visual field index
Octopus
Humphrey
automated perimetry
fluctuation-weighting
visual field index
Octopus
Humphrey
automated perimetry
fluctuation-weighting
Abstract The main visual field indices of Flammer and the analogous ones of Heijl have been compared based on a population of 113 glaucomatous visual fields. It is shown that for the population studied, the differences between the two sets of indices are negligible for Octopus G1 program results and that they may thus be used interchangeably.
1573-2630
15732630
Springer
shingle_catch_all_3 Funkhouser, A. T.
Fankhauser, F.
A comparison of unweighted and fluctuation-weighted indices (within the central 28° of glaucomatous visual fields measured with the Octopus automated perimeter)
visual field index
Octopus
Humphrey
automated perimetry
fluctuation-weighting
visual field index
Octopus
Humphrey
automated perimetry
fluctuation-weighting
Abstract The main visual field indices of Flammer and the analogous ones of Heijl have been compared based on a population of 113 glaucomatous visual fields. It is shown that for the population studied, the differences between the two sets of indices are negligible for Octopus G1 program results and that they may thus be used interchangeably.
1573-2630
15732630
Springer
shingle_catch_all_4 Funkhouser, A. T.
Fankhauser, F.
A comparison of unweighted and fluctuation-weighted indices (within the central 28° of glaucomatous visual fields measured with the Octopus automated perimeter)
visual field index
Octopus
Humphrey
automated perimetry
fluctuation-weighting
visual field index
Octopus
Humphrey
automated perimetry
fluctuation-weighting
Abstract The main visual field indices of Flammer and the analogous ones of Heijl have been compared based on a population of 113 glaucomatous visual fields. It is shown that for the population studied, the differences between the two sets of indices are negligible for Octopus G1 program results and that they may thus be used interchangeably.
1573-2630
15732630
Springer
shingle_title_1 A comparison of unweighted and fluctuation-weighted indices (within the central 28° of glaucomatous visual fields measured with the Octopus automated perimeter)
shingle_title_2 A comparison of unweighted and fluctuation-weighted indices (within the central 28° of glaucomatous visual fields measured with the Octopus automated perimeter)
shingle_title_3 A comparison of unweighted and fluctuation-weighted indices (within the central 28° of glaucomatous visual fields measured with the Octopus automated perimeter)
shingle_title_4 A comparison of unweighted and fluctuation-weighted indices (within the central 28° of glaucomatous visual fields measured with the Octopus automated perimeter)
sigel_instance_filter dkfz
geomar
wilbert
ipn
albert
fhp
source_archive Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
timestamp 2024-05-06T09:55:31.938Z
titel A comparison of unweighted and fluctuation-weighted indices (within the central 28° of glaucomatous visual fields measured with the Octopus automated perimeter)
titel_suche A comparison of unweighted and fluctuation-weighted indices (within the central 28° of glaucomatous visual fields measured with the Octopus automated perimeter)
topic WW-YZ
uid nat_lic_papers_NLM194443671