Verifying Inventory Predictions of Animal Methane Emissions with Meteorological Measurements
Denmead, O. T. ; Leuning, R. ; Griffith, D. W. T. ; Jamie, I. M. ; Esler, M. B. ; Harper, L. A. ; Freney, J. R.
Springer
Published 2000
Springer
Published 2000
| ISSN: |
1573-1472
|
|---|---|
| Keywords: |
Mass balance ; Flux-gradient ; Boundary-layer budgeting ; Enteric fermentation
|
| Source: |
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
|
| Topics: |
Geosciences
Physics
|
| Notes: |
Abstract The paper examines the strengths and weaknesses of a rangeof meteorological flux measurement techniques that mightbe used to verify predictions of greenhouse gas inventories.Recent research into emissions of methane (CH4)produced by enteric fermentation in grazing cattle and sheepis used to illustrate various methodologies. Quantifying thisimportant source presents special difficulties because the animalsconstitute moving, heterogeneously distributed, intermittent, pointsources. There are two general approaches: one, from the bottom up,involves direct measurements of emissions from a known number ofanimals, and the other, from the top down, infers areal emissions ofCH4 from its atmospheric signature. A mass-balance methodproved successful for bottom-up verification. It permits undisturbedgrazing, has a simple theoretical basis and is appropriate for fluxmeasurements on small plots and where there are scattered pointsources. The top-down methodologies include conventional flux-gradientapproaches and convective and nocturnal boundary-layer (CBL and NBL)budgeting schemes. Particular attention is given to CBL budget methods inboth differential and integral form. All top-down methodologies require ideal weather conditions for their application, and they suffer from the scattered nature of the source, varying wind directions and low instrument resolution. As for mass-balance, flux-gradient micrometeorological measurements were in good agreement with inventory predictions of CH4 production by livestock, but the standard errors associated with both methods were too large to permit detection of changes of a few per cent in emission rate, which might be important for inventory, regulatory or research purposes. Fluxes calculated by CBL and NBL methods were of the same order of magnitude as inventory predictions, but more improvement is needed before their use can be endorsed. Opportunities for improving the precision of both bottom-up and top-down methodologies are discussed.
|
| Type of Medium: |
Electronic Resource
|
| URL: |
| _version_ | 1798296605549395969 |
|---|---|
| autor | Denmead, O. T. Leuning, R. Griffith, D. W. T. Jamie, I. M. Esler, M. B. Harper, L. A. Freney, J. R. |
| autorsonst | Denmead, O. T. Leuning, R. Griffith, D. W. T. Jamie, I. M. Esler, M. B. Harper, L. A. Freney, J. R. |
| book_url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1002604505377 |
| datenlieferant | nat_lic_papers |
| hauptsatz | hsatz_simple |
| identnr | NLM193504561 |
| issn | 1573-1472 |
| journal_name | Boundary layer meteorology |
| materialart | 1 |
| notes | Abstract The paper examines the strengths and weaknesses of a rangeof meteorological flux measurement techniques that mightbe used to verify predictions of greenhouse gas inventories.Recent research into emissions of methane (CH4)produced by enteric fermentation in grazing cattle and sheepis used to illustrate various methodologies. Quantifying thisimportant source presents special difficulties because the animalsconstitute moving, heterogeneously distributed, intermittent, pointsources. There are two general approaches: one, from the bottom up,involves direct measurements of emissions from a known number ofanimals, and the other, from the top down, infers areal emissions ofCH4 from its atmospheric signature. A mass-balance methodproved successful for bottom-up verification. It permits undisturbedgrazing, has a simple theoretical basis and is appropriate for fluxmeasurements on small plots and where there are scattered pointsources. The top-down methodologies include conventional flux-gradientapproaches and convective and nocturnal boundary-layer (CBL and NBL)budgeting schemes. Particular attention is given to CBL budget methods inboth differential and integral form. All top-down methodologies require ideal weather conditions for their application, and they suffer from the scattered nature of the source, varying wind directions and low instrument resolution. As for mass-balance, flux-gradient micrometeorological measurements were in good agreement with inventory predictions of CH4 production by livestock, but the standard errors associated with both methods were too large to permit detection of changes of a few per cent in emission rate, which might be important for inventory, regulatory or research purposes. Fluxes calculated by CBL and NBL methods were of the same order of magnitude as inventory predictions, but more improvement is needed before their use can be endorsed. Opportunities for improving the precision of both bottom-up and top-down methodologies are discussed. |
| package_name | Springer |
| publikationsjahr_anzeige | 2000 |
| publikationsjahr_facette | 2000 |
| publikationsjahr_intervall | 7999:2000-2004 |
| publikationsjahr_sort | 2000 |
| publisher | Springer |
| reference | 96 (2000), S. 187-209 |
| schlagwort | Mass balance Flux-gradient Boundary-layer budgeting Enteric fermentation |
| search_space | articles |
| shingle_author_1 | Denmead, O. T. Leuning, R. Griffith, D. W. T. Jamie, I. M. Esler, M. B. Harper, L. A. Freney, J. R. |
| shingle_author_2 | Denmead, O. T. Leuning, R. Griffith, D. W. T. Jamie, I. M. Esler, M. B. Harper, L. A. Freney, J. R. |
| shingle_author_3 | Denmead, O. T. Leuning, R. Griffith, D. W. T. Jamie, I. M. Esler, M. B. Harper, L. A. Freney, J. R. |
| shingle_author_4 | Denmead, O. T. Leuning, R. Griffith, D. W. T. Jamie, I. M. Esler, M. B. Harper, L. A. Freney, J. R. |
| shingle_catch_all_1 | Denmead, O. T. Leuning, R. Griffith, D. W. T. Jamie, I. M. Esler, M. B. Harper, L. A. Freney, J. R. Verifying Inventory Predictions of Animal Methane Emissions with Meteorological Measurements Mass balance Flux-gradient Boundary-layer budgeting Enteric fermentation Mass balance Flux-gradient Boundary-layer budgeting Enteric fermentation Abstract The paper examines the strengths and weaknesses of a rangeof meteorological flux measurement techniques that mightbe used to verify predictions of greenhouse gas inventories.Recent research into emissions of methane (CH4)produced by enteric fermentation in grazing cattle and sheepis used to illustrate various methodologies. Quantifying thisimportant source presents special difficulties because the animalsconstitute moving, heterogeneously distributed, intermittent, pointsources. There are two general approaches: one, from the bottom up,involves direct measurements of emissions from a known number ofanimals, and the other, from the top down, infers areal emissions ofCH4 from its atmospheric signature. A mass-balance methodproved successful for bottom-up verification. It permits undisturbedgrazing, has a simple theoretical basis and is appropriate for fluxmeasurements on small plots and where there are scattered pointsources. The top-down methodologies include conventional flux-gradientapproaches and convective and nocturnal boundary-layer (CBL and NBL)budgeting schemes. Particular attention is given to CBL budget methods inboth differential and integral form. All top-down methodologies require ideal weather conditions for their application, and they suffer from the scattered nature of the source, varying wind directions and low instrument resolution. As for mass-balance, flux-gradient micrometeorological measurements were in good agreement with inventory predictions of CH4 production by livestock, but the standard errors associated with both methods were too large to permit detection of changes of a few per cent in emission rate, which might be important for inventory, regulatory or research purposes. Fluxes calculated by CBL and NBL methods were of the same order of magnitude as inventory predictions, but more improvement is needed before their use can be endorsed. Opportunities for improving the precision of both bottom-up and top-down methodologies are discussed. 1573-1472 15731472 Springer |
| shingle_catch_all_2 | Denmead, O. T. Leuning, R. Griffith, D. W. T. Jamie, I. M. Esler, M. B. Harper, L. A. Freney, J. R. Verifying Inventory Predictions of Animal Methane Emissions with Meteorological Measurements Mass balance Flux-gradient Boundary-layer budgeting Enteric fermentation Mass balance Flux-gradient Boundary-layer budgeting Enteric fermentation Abstract The paper examines the strengths and weaknesses of a rangeof meteorological flux measurement techniques that mightbe used to verify predictions of greenhouse gas inventories.Recent research into emissions of methane (CH4)produced by enteric fermentation in grazing cattle and sheepis used to illustrate various methodologies. Quantifying thisimportant source presents special difficulties because the animalsconstitute moving, heterogeneously distributed, intermittent, pointsources. There are two general approaches: one, from the bottom up,involves direct measurements of emissions from a known number ofanimals, and the other, from the top down, infers areal emissions ofCH4 from its atmospheric signature. A mass-balance methodproved successful for bottom-up verification. It permits undisturbedgrazing, has a simple theoretical basis and is appropriate for fluxmeasurements on small plots and where there are scattered pointsources. The top-down methodologies include conventional flux-gradientapproaches and convective and nocturnal boundary-layer (CBL and NBL)budgeting schemes. Particular attention is given to CBL budget methods inboth differential and integral form. All top-down methodologies require ideal weather conditions for their application, and they suffer from the scattered nature of the source, varying wind directions and low instrument resolution. As for mass-balance, flux-gradient micrometeorological measurements were in good agreement with inventory predictions of CH4 production by livestock, but the standard errors associated with both methods were too large to permit detection of changes of a few per cent in emission rate, which might be important for inventory, regulatory or research purposes. Fluxes calculated by CBL and NBL methods were of the same order of magnitude as inventory predictions, but more improvement is needed before their use can be endorsed. Opportunities for improving the precision of both bottom-up and top-down methodologies are discussed. 1573-1472 15731472 Springer |
| shingle_catch_all_3 | Denmead, O. T. Leuning, R. Griffith, D. W. T. Jamie, I. M. Esler, M. B. Harper, L. A. Freney, J. R. Verifying Inventory Predictions of Animal Methane Emissions with Meteorological Measurements Mass balance Flux-gradient Boundary-layer budgeting Enteric fermentation Mass balance Flux-gradient Boundary-layer budgeting Enteric fermentation Abstract The paper examines the strengths and weaknesses of a rangeof meteorological flux measurement techniques that mightbe used to verify predictions of greenhouse gas inventories.Recent research into emissions of methane (CH4)produced by enteric fermentation in grazing cattle and sheepis used to illustrate various methodologies. Quantifying thisimportant source presents special difficulties because the animalsconstitute moving, heterogeneously distributed, intermittent, pointsources. There are two general approaches: one, from the bottom up,involves direct measurements of emissions from a known number ofanimals, and the other, from the top down, infers areal emissions ofCH4 from its atmospheric signature. A mass-balance methodproved successful for bottom-up verification. It permits undisturbedgrazing, has a simple theoretical basis and is appropriate for fluxmeasurements on small plots and where there are scattered pointsources. The top-down methodologies include conventional flux-gradientapproaches and convective and nocturnal boundary-layer (CBL and NBL)budgeting schemes. Particular attention is given to CBL budget methods inboth differential and integral form. All top-down methodologies require ideal weather conditions for their application, and they suffer from the scattered nature of the source, varying wind directions and low instrument resolution. As for mass-balance, flux-gradient micrometeorological measurements were in good agreement with inventory predictions of CH4 production by livestock, but the standard errors associated with both methods were too large to permit detection of changes of a few per cent in emission rate, which might be important for inventory, regulatory or research purposes. Fluxes calculated by CBL and NBL methods were of the same order of magnitude as inventory predictions, but more improvement is needed before their use can be endorsed. Opportunities for improving the precision of both bottom-up and top-down methodologies are discussed. 1573-1472 15731472 Springer |
| shingle_catch_all_4 | Denmead, O. T. Leuning, R. Griffith, D. W. T. Jamie, I. M. Esler, M. B. Harper, L. A. Freney, J. R. Verifying Inventory Predictions of Animal Methane Emissions with Meteorological Measurements Mass balance Flux-gradient Boundary-layer budgeting Enteric fermentation Mass balance Flux-gradient Boundary-layer budgeting Enteric fermentation Abstract The paper examines the strengths and weaknesses of a rangeof meteorological flux measurement techniques that mightbe used to verify predictions of greenhouse gas inventories.Recent research into emissions of methane (CH4)produced by enteric fermentation in grazing cattle and sheepis used to illustrate various methodologies. Quantifying thisimportant source presents special difficulties because the animalsconstitute moving, heterogeneously distributed, intermittent, pointsources. There are two general approaches: one, from the bottom up,involves direct measurements of emissions from a known number ofanimals, and the other, from the top down, infers areal emissions ofCH4 from its atmospheric signature. A mass-balance methodproved successful for bottom-up verification. It permits undisturbedgrazing, has a simple theoretical basis and is appropriate for fluxmeasurements on small plots and where there are scattered pointsources. The top-down methodologies include conventional flux-gradientapproaches and convective and nocturnal boundary-layer (CBL and NBL)budgeting schemes. Particular attention is given to CBL budget methods inboth differential and integral form. All top-down methodologies require ideal weather conditions for their application, and they suffer from the scattered nature of the source, varying wind directions and low instrument resolution. As for mass-balance, flux-gradient micrometeorological measurements were in good agreement with inventory predictions of CH4 production by livestock, but the standard errors associated with both methods were too large to permit detection of changes of a few per cent in emission rate, which might be important for inventory, regulatory or research purposes. Fluxes calculated by CBL and NBL methods were of the same order of magnitude as inventory predictions, but more improvement is needed before their use can be endorsed. Opportunities for improving the precision of both bottom-up and top-down methodologies are discussed. 1573-1472 15731472 Springer |
| shingle_title_1 | Verifying Inventory Predictions of Animal Methane Emissions with Meteorological Measurements |
| shingle_title_2 | Verifying Inventory Predictions of Animal Methane Emissions with Meteorological Measurements |
| shingle_title_3 | Verifying Inventory Predictions of Animal Methane Emissions with Meteorological Measurements |
| shingle_title_4 | Verifying Inventory Predictions of Animal Methane Emissions with Meteorological Measurements |
| sigel_instance_filter | dkfz geomar wilbert ipn albert fhp |
| source_archive | Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000 |
| timestamp | 2024-05-06T09:54:44.716Z |
| titel | Verifying Inventory Predictions of Animal Methane Emissions with Meteorological Measurements |
| titel_suche | Verifying Inventory Predictions of Animal Methane Emissions with Meteorological Measurements |
| topic | TE-TZ U |
| uid | nat_lic_papers_NLM193504561 |