Consensus guidelines on the optimal management in interventional EUS procedures: results from the Asian EUS group RAND/UCLA expert panel

Publication Date:
2018-06-08
Publisher:
BMJ Publishing Group
Print ISSN:
0017-5749
Electronic ISSN:
1468-3288
Topics:
Medicine
Keywords:
Gut
Published by:
http://www.bmj.com/
_version_ 1836398964188905473
autor Teoh, A. Y. B., Dhir, V., Kida, M., Yasuda, I., Jin, Z. D., Seo, D. W., Almadi, M., Ang, T. L., Hara, K., Hilmi, I., Itoi, T., Lakhtakia, S., Matsuda, K., Pausawasdi, N., Puri, R., Tang, R. S., Wang, H.-P., Yang, A. M., Hawes, R., Varadarajulu, S., Yasuda, K., Ho, L. K. Y.
beschreibung Objectives Interventional endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) procedures are gaining popularity and the most commonly performed procedures include EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst, EUS-guided biliary drainage, EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage and EUS-guided celiac plexus ablation. The aim of this paper is to formulate a set of practice guidelines addressing various aspects of the above procedures. Methods Formulation of the guidelines was based on the best scientific evidence available. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology (RAM) was used. Panellists recruited comprised experts in surgery, interventional EUS, interventional radiology and oncology from 11 countries. Between June 2014 and October 2016, the panellists met in meetings to discuss and vote on the clinical scenarios for each of the interventional EUS procedures in question. Results A total of 15 statements on EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst, 15 statements on EUS-guided biliary drainage, 12 statements on EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage and 14 statements on EUS-guided celiac plexus ablation were formulated. The statements addressed the indications for the procedures, technical aspects, pre- and post-procedural management, management of complications, and competency and training in the procedures. All statements except one were found to be appropriate. Randomised studies to address clinical questions in a number of aspects of the procedures are urgently required. Conclusions The current guidelines on interventional EUS procedures are the first published by an endoscopic society. These guidelines provide an in-depth review of the current evidence and standardise the management of the procedures.
citation_standardnr 6278841
datenlieferant ipn_articles
feed_id 3103
feed_publisher BMJ Publishing Group
feed_publisher_url http://www.bmj.com/
insertion_date 2018-06-08
journaleissn 1468-3288
journalissn 0017-5749
publikationsjahr_anzeige 2018
publikationsjahr_facette 2018
publikationsjahr_intervall 7984:2015-2019
publikationsjahr_sort 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
quelle Gut
relation http://gut.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/7/1209?rss=1
schlagwort Gut
search_space articles
shingle_author_1 Teoh, A. Y. B., Dhir, V., Kida, M., Yasuda, I., Jin, Z. D., Seo, D. W., Almadi, M., Ang, T. L., Hara, K., Hilmi, I., Itoi, T., Lakhtakia, S., Matsuda, K., Pausawasdi, N., Puri, R., Tang, R. S., Wang, H.-P., Yang, A. M., Hawes, R., Varadarajulu, S., Yasuda, K., Ho, L. K. Y.
shingle_author_2 Teoh, A. Y. B., Dhir, V., Kida, M., Yasuda, I., Jin, Z. D., Seo, D. W., Almadi, M., Ang, T. L., Hara, K., Hilmi, I., Itoi, T., Lakhtakia, S., Matsuda, K., Pausawasdi, N., Puri, R., Tang, R. S., Wang, H.-P., Yang, A. M., Hawes, R., Varadarajulu, S., Yasuda, K., Ho, L. K. Y.
shingle_author_3 Teoh, A. Y. B., Dhir, V., Kida, M., Yasuda, I., Jin, Z. D., Seo, D. W., Almadi, M., Ang, T. L., Hara, K., Hilmi, I., Itoi, T., Lakhtakia, S., Matsuda, K., Pausawasdi, N., Puri, R., Tang, R. S., Wang, H.-P., Yang, A. M., Hawes, R., Varadarajulu, S., Yasuda, K., Ho, L. K. Y.
shingle_author_4 Teoh, A. Y. B., Dhir, V., Kida, M., Yasuda, I., Jin, Z. D., Seo, D. W., Almadi, M., Ang, T. L., Hara, K., Hilmi, I., Itoi, T., Lakhtakia, S., Matsuda, K., Pausawasdi, N., Puri, R., Tang, R. S., Wang, H.-P., Yang, A. M., Hawes, R., Varadarajulu, S., Yasuda, K., Ho, L. K. Y.
shingle_catch_all_1 Consensus guidelines on the optimal management in interventional EUS procedures: results from the Asian EUS group RAND/UCLA expert panel
Gut
Objectives Interventional endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) procedures are gaining popularity and the most commonly performed procedures include EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst, EUS-guided biliary drainage, EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage and EUS-guided celiac plexus ablation. The aim of this paper is to formulate a set of practice guidelines addressing various aspects of the above procedures. Methods Formulation of the guidelines was based on the best scientific evidence available. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology (RAM) was used. Panellists recruited comprised experts in surgery, interventional EUS, interventional radiology and oncology from 11 countries. Between June 2014 and October 2016, the panellists met in meetings to discuss and vote on the clinical scenarios for each of the interventional EUS procedures in question. Results A total of 15 statements on EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst, 15 statements on EUS-guided biliary drainage, 12 statements on EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage and 14 statements on EUS-guided celiac plexus ablation were formulated. The statements addressed the indications for the procedures, technical aspects, pre- and post-procedural management, management of complications, and competency and training in the procedures. All statements except one were found to be appropriate. Randomised studies to address clinical questions in a number of aspects of the procedures are urgently required. Conclusions The current guidelines on interventional EUS procedures are the first published by an endoscopic society. These guidelines provide an in-depth review of the current evidence and standardise the management of the procedures.
Teoh, A. Y. B., Dhir, V., Kida, M., Yasuda, I., Jin, Z. D., Seo, D. W., Almadi, M., Ang, T. L., Hara, K., Hilmi, I., Itoi, T., Lakhtakia, S., Matsuda, K., Pausawasdi, N., Puri, R., Tang, R. S., Wang, H.-P., Yang, A. M., Hawes, R., Varadarajulu, S., Yasuda, K., Ho, L. K. Y.
BMJ Publishing Group
0017-5749
00175749
1468-3288
14683288
shingle_catch_all_2 Consensus guidelines on the optimal management in interventional EUS procedures: results from the Asian EUS group RAND/UCLA expert panel
Gut
Objectives Interventional endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) procedures are gaining popularity and the most commonly performed procedures include EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst, EUS-guided biliary drainage, EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage and EUS-guided celiac plexus ablation. The aim of this paper is to formulate a set of practice guidelines addressing various aspects of the above procedures. Methods Formulation of the guidelines was based on the best scientific evidence available. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology (RAM) was used. Panellists recruited comprised experts in surgery, interventional EUS, interventional radiology and oncology from 11 countries. Between June 2014 and October 2016, the panellists met in meetings to discuss and vote on the clinical scenarios for each of the interventional EUS procedures in question. Results A total of 15 statements on EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst, 15 statements on EUS-guided biliary drainage, 12 statements on EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage and 14 statements on EUS-guided celiac plexus ablation were formulated. The statements addressed the indications for the procedures, technical aspects, pre- and post-procedural management, management of complications, and competency and training in the procedures. All statements except one were found to be appropriate. Randomised studies to address clinical questions in a number of aspects of the procedures are urgently required. Conclusions The current guidelines on interventional EUS procedures are the first published by an endoscopic society. These guidelines provide an in-depth review of the current evidence and standardise the management of the procedures.
Teoh, A. Y. B., Dhir, V., Kida, M., Yasuda, I., Jin, Z. D., Seo, D. W., Almadi, M., Ang, T. L., Hara, K., Hilmi, I., Itoi, T., Lakhtakia, S., Matsuda, K., Pausawasdi, N., Puri, R., Tang, R. S., Wang, H.-P., Yang, A. M., Hawes, R., Varadarajulu, S., Yasuda, K., Ho, L. K. Y.
BMJ Publishing Group
0017-5749
00175749
1468-3288
14683288
shingle_catch_all_3 Consensus guidelines on the optimal management in interventional EUS procedures: results from the Asian EUS group RAND/UCLA expert panel
Gut
Objectives Interventional endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) procedures are gaining popularity and the most commonly performed procedures include EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst, EUS-guided biliary drainage, EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage and EUS-guided celiac plexus ablation. The aim of this paper is to formulate a set of practice guidelines addressing various aspects of the above procedures. Methods Formulation of the guidelines was based on the best scientific evidence available. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology (RAM) was used. Panellists recruited comprised experts in surgery, interventional EUS, interventional radiology and oncology from 11 countries. Between June 2014 and October 2016, the panellists met in meetings to discuss and vote on the clinical scenarios for each of the interventional EUS procedures in question. Results A total of 15 statements on EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst, 15 statements on EUS-guided biliary drainage, 12 statements on EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage and 14 statements on EUS-guided celiac plexus ablation were formulated. The statements addressed the indications for the procedures, technical aspects, pre- and post-procedural management, management of complications, and competency and training in the procedures. All statements except one were found to be appropriate. Randomised studies to address clinical questions in a number of aspects of the procedures are urgently required. Conclusions The current guidelines on interventional EUS procedures are the first published by an endoscopic society. These guidelines provide an in-depth review of the current evidence and standardise the management of the procedures.
Teoh, A. Y. B., Dhir, V., Kida, M., Yasuda, I., Jin, Z. D., Seo, D. W., Almadi, M., Ang, T. L., Hara, K., Hilmi, I., Itoi, T., Lakhtakia, S., Matsuda, K., Pausawasdi, N., Puri, R., Tang, R. S., Wang, H.-P., Yang, A. M., Hawes, R., Varadarajulu, S., Yasuda, K., Ho, L. K. Y.
BMJ Publishing Group
0017-5749
00175749
1468-3288
14683288
shingle_catch_all_4 Consensus guidelines on the optimal management in interventional EUS procedures: results from the Asian EUS group RAND/UCLA expert panel
Gut
Objectives Interventional endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) procedures are gaining popularity and the most commonly performed procedures include EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst, EUS-guided biliary drainage, EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage and EUS-guided celiac plexus ablation. The aim of this paper is to formulate a set of practice guidelines addressing various aspects of the above procedures. Methods Formulation of the guidelines was based on the best scientific evidence available. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology (RAM) was used. Panellists recruited comprised experts in surgery, interventional EUS, interventional radiology and oncology from 11 countries. Between June 2014 and October 2016, the panellists met in meetings to discuss and vote on the clinical scenarios for each of the interventional EUS procedures in question. Results A total of 15 statements on EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst, 15 statements on EUS-guided biliary drainage, 12 statements on EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage and 14 statements on EUS-guided celiac plexus ablation were formulated. The statements addressed the indications for the procedures, technical aspects, pre- and post-procedural management, management of complications, and competency and training in the procedures. All statements except one were found to be appropriate. Randomised studies to address clinical questions in a number of aspects of the procedures are urgently required. Conclusions The current guidelines on interventional EUS procedures are the first published by an endoscopic society. These guidelines provide an in-depth review of the current evidence and standardise the management of the procedures.
Teoh, A. Y. B., Dhir, V., Kida, M., Yasuda, I., Jin, Z. D., Seo, D. W., Almadi, M., Ang, T. L., Hara, K., Hilmi, I., Itoi, T., Lakhtakia, S., Matsuda, K., Pausawasdi, N., Puri, R., Tang, R. S., Wang, H.-P., Yang, A. M., Hawes, R., Varadarajulu, S., Yasuda, K., Ho, L. K. Y.
BMJ Publishing Group
0017-5749
00175749
1468-3288
14683288
shingle_title_1 Consensus guidelines on the optimal management in interventional EUS procedures: results from the Asian EUS group RAND/UCLA expert panel
shingle_title_2 Consensus guidelines on the optimal management in interventional EUS procedures: results from the Asian EUS group RAND/UCLA expert panel
shingle_title_3 Consensus guidelines on the optimal management in interventional EUS procedures: results from the Asian EUS group RAND/UCLA expert panel
shingle_title_4 Consensus guidelines on the optimal management in interventional EUS procedures: results from the Asian EUS group RAND/UCLA expert panel
timestamp 2025-06-30T23:35:26.683Z
titel Consensus guidelines on the optimal management in interventional EUS procedures: results from the Asian EUS group RAND/UCLA expert panel
titel_suche Consensus guidelines on the optimal management in interventional EUS procedures: results from the Asian EUS group RAND/UCLA expert panel
topic WW-YZ
uid ipn_articles_6278841