Research priorities in health communication and participation: international survey of consumers and other stakeholders

Publication Date:
2018-05-09
Publisher:
BMJ Publishing
Electronic ISSN:
2044-6055
Topics:
Medicine
Keywords:
Open access, Communication, Communication
Published by:
http://group.bmj.com/
_version_ 1836398924445777920
autor Synnot, A., Bragge, P., Lowe, D., Nunn, J. S., OSullivan, M., Horvat, L., Tong, A., Kay, D., Ghersi, D., McDonald, S., Poole, N., Bourke, N., Lannin, N., Vadasz, D., Oliver, S., Carey, K., Hill, S. J.
beschreibung Objective To identify research priorities of consumers and other stakeholders to inform Cochrane Reviews in ‘health communication and participation’ (including such concepts as patient experience, shared decision-making and health literacy). Setting International. Participants We included anyone with an interest in health communication and participation. Up to 151 participants (18–80 years; 117 female) across 12 countries took part, including 48 consumers (patients, carers, consumer representatives) and 75 professionals (health professionals, policymakers, researchers) (plus 25 people who identified as both). Design Survey. Methods We invited people to submit their research ideas via an online survey open for 4 weeks. Using inductive thematic analysis, we generated priority research topics, then classified these into broader themes. Results Participants submitted 200 research ideas, which we grouped into 21 priority topics. Key research priorities included: insufficient consumer involvement in research (19 responses), ‘official’ health information is contradictory and hard to understand (18 responses), communication/coordination breakdowns in health services (15 responses), health information provision a low priority for health professionals (15 responses), insufficient eliciting of patient preferences (14 responses), health services poorly understand/implement patient-centred care (14 responses), lack of holistic care impacting healthcare quality and safety (13 responses) and inadequate consumer involvement in service design (11 responses). These priorities encompassed acute and community health settings, with implications for policy and research. Priority populations of interest included people from diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds, carers, and people with low educational attainment, or mental illness. Most frequently suggested interventions focused on training and cultural change activities for health services and health professionals. Conclusions Consumers and other stakeholders want research addressing structural and cultural challenges in health services (eg, lack of holistic, patient-centred, culturally safe care) and building health professionals’ communication skills. Solutions should be devised in partnership with consumers, and focus on the needs of vulnerable groups.
citation_standardnr 6253511
datenlieferant ipn_articles
feed_id 151627
feed_publisher BMJ Publishing
feed_publisher_url http://group.bmj.com/
insertion_date 2018-05-09
journaleissn 2044-6055
publikationsjahr_anzeige 2018
publikationsjahr_facette 2018
publikationsjahr_intervall 7984:2015-2019
publikationsjahr_sort 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing
quelle BMJ Open
relation http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/8/5/e019481?rss=1
schlagwort Open access, Communication, Communication
search_space articles
shingle_author_1 Synnot, A., Bragge, P., Lowe, D., Nunn, J. S., OSullivan, M., Horvat, L., Tong, A., Kay, D., Ghersi, D., McDonald, S., Poole, N., Bourke, N., Lannin, N., Vadasz, D., Oliver, S., Carey, K., Hill, S. J.
shingle_author_2 Synnot, A., Bragge, P., Lowe, D., Nunn, J. S., OSullivan, M., Horvat, L., Tong, A., Kay, D., Ghersi, D., McDonald, S., Poole, N., Bourke, N., Lannin, N., Vadasz, D., Oliver, S., Carey, K., Hill, S. J.
shingle_author_3 Synnot, A., Bragge, P., Lowe, D., Nunn, J. S., OSullivan, M., Horvat, L., Tong, A., Kay, D., Ghersi, D., McDonald, S., Poole, N., Bourke, N., Lannin, N., Vadasz, D., Oliver, S., Carey, K., Hill, S. J.
shingle_author_4 Synnot, A., Bragge, P., Lowe, D., Nunn, J. S., OSullivan, M., Horvat, L., Tong, A., Kay, D., Ghersi, D., McDonald, S., Poole, N., Bourke, N., Lannin, N., Vadasz, D., Oliver, S., Carey, K., Hill, S. J.
shingle_catch_all_1 Research priorities in health communication and participation: international survey of consumers and other stakeholders
Open access, Communication, Communication
Objective To identify research priorities of consumers and other stakeholders to inform Cochrane Reviews in ‘health communication and participation’ (including such concepts as patient experience, shared decision-making and health literacy). Setting International. Participants We included anyone with an interest in health communication and participation. Up to 151 participants (18–80 years; 117 female) across 12 countries took part, including 48 consumers (patients, carers, consumer representatives) and 75 professionals (health professionals, policymakers, researchers) (plus 25 people who identified as both). Design Survey. Methods We invited people to submit their research ideas via an online survey open for 4 weeks. Using inductive thematic analysis, we generated priority research topics, then classified these into broader themes. Results Participants submitted 200 research ideas, which we grouped into 21 priority topics. Key research priorities included: insufficient consumer involvement in research (19 responses), ‘official’ health information is contradictory and hard to understand (18 responses), communication/coordination breakdowns in health services (15 responses), health information provision a low priority for health professionals (15 responses), insufficient eliciting of patient preferences (14 responses), health services poorly understand/implement patient-centred care (14 responses), lack of holistic care impacting healthcare quality and safety (13 responses) and inadequate consumer involvement in service design (11 responses). These priorities encompassed acute and community health settings, with implications for policy and research. Priority populations of interest included people from diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds, carers, and people with low educational attainment, or mental illness. Most frequently suggested interventions focused on training and cultural change activities for health services and health professionals. Conclusions Consumers and other stakeholders want research addressing structural and cultural challenges in health services (eg, lack of holistic, patient-centred, culturally safe care) and building health professionals’ communication skills. Solutions should be devised in partnership with consumers, and focus on the needs of vulnerable groups.
Synnot, A., Bragge, P., Lowe, D., Nunn, J. S., OSullivan, M., Horvat, L., Tong, A., Kay, D., Ghersi, D., McDonald, S., Poole, N., Bourke, N., Lannin, N., Vadasz, D., Oliver, S., Carey, K., Hill, S. J.
BMJ Publishing
2044-6055
20446055
shingle_catch_all_2 Research priorities in health communication and participation: international survey of consumers and other stakeholders
Open access, Communication, Communication
Objective To identify research priorities of consumers and other stakeholders to inform Cochrane Reviews in ‘health communication and participation’ (including such concepts as patient experience, shared decision-making and health literacy). Setting International. Participants We included anyone with an interest in health communication and participation. Up to 151 participants (18–80 years; 117 female) across 12 countries took part, including 48 consumers (patients, carers, consumer representatives) and 75 professionals (health professionals, policymakers, researchers) (plus 25 people who identified as both). Design Survey. Methods We invited people to submit their research ideas via an online survey open for 4 weeks. Using inductive thematic analysis, we generated priority research topics, then classified these into broader themes. Results Participants submitted 200 research ideas, which we grouped into 21 priority topics. Key research priorities included: insufficient consumer involvement in research (19 responses), ‘official’ health information is contradictory and hard to understand (18 responses), communication/coordination breakdowns in health services (15 responses), health information provision a low priority for health professionals (15 responses), insufficient eliciting of patient preferences (14 responses), health services poorly understand/implement patient-centred care (14 responses), lack of holistic care impacting healthcare quality and safety (13 responses) and inadequate consumer involvement in service design (11 responses). These priorities encompassed acute and community health settings, with implications for policy and research. Priority populations of interest included people from diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds, carers, and people with low educational attainment, or mental illness. Most frequently suggested interventions focused on training and cultural change activities for health services and health professionals. Conclusions Consumers and other stakeholders want research addressing structural and cultural challenges in health services (eg, lack of holistic, patient-centred, culturally safe care) and building health professionals’ communication skills. Solutions should be devised in partnership with consumers, and focus on the needs of vulnerable groups.
Synnot, A., Bragge, P., Lowe, D., Nunn, J. S., OSullivan, M., Horvat, L., Tong, A., Kay, D., Ghersi, D., McDonald, S., Poole, N., Bourke, N., Lannin, N., Vadasz, D., Oliver, S., Carey, K., Hill, S. J.
BMJ Publishing
2044-6055
20446055
shingle_catch_all_3 Research priorities in health communication and participation: international survey of consumers and other stakeholders
Open access, Communication, Communication
Objective To identify research priorities of consumers and other stakeholders to inform Cochrane Reviews in ‘health communication and participation’ (including such concepts as patient experience, shared decision-making and health literacy). Setting International. Participants We included anyone with an interest in health communication and participation. Up to 151 participants (18–80 years; 117 female) across 12 countries took part, including 48 consumers (patients, carers, consumer representatives) and 75 professionals (health professionals, policymakers, researchers) (plus 25 people who identified as both). Design Survey. Methods We invited people to submit their research ideas via an online survey open for 4 weeks. Using inductive thematic analysis, we generated priority research topics, then classified these into broader themes. Results Participants submitted 200 research ideas, which we grouped into 21 priority topics. Key research priorities included: insufficient consumer involvement in research (19 responses), ‘official’ health information is contradictory and hard to understand (18 responses), communication/coordination breakdowns in health services (15 responses), health information provision a low priority for health professionals (15 responses), insufficient eliciting of patient preferences (14 responses), health services poorly understand/implement patient-centred care (14 responses), lack of holistic care impacting healthcare quality and safety (13 responses) and inadequate consumer involvement in service design (11 responses). These priorities encompassed acute and community health settings, with implications for policy and research. Priority populations of interest included people from diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds, carers, and people with low educational attainment, or mental illness. Most frequently suggested interventions focused on training and cultural change activities for health services and health professionals. Conclusions Consumers and other stakeholders want research addressing structural and cultural challenges in health services (eg, lack of holistic, patient-centred, culturally safe care) and building health professionals’ communication skills. Solutions should be devised in partnership with consumers, and focus on the needs of vulnerable groups.
Synnot, A., Bragge, P., Lowe, D., Nunn, J. S., OSullivan, M., Horvat, L., Tong, A., Kay, D., Ghersi, D., McDonald, S., Poole, N., Bourke, N., Lannin, N., Vadasz, D., Oliver, S., Carey, K., Hill, S. J.
BMJ Publishing
2044-6055
20446055
shingle_catch_all_4 Research priorities in health communication and participation: international survey of consumers and other stakeholders
Open access, Communication, Communication
Objective To identify research priorities of consumers and other stakeholders to inform Cochrane Reviews in ‘health communication and participation’ (including such concepts as patient experience, shared decision-making and health literacy). Setting International. Participants We included anyone with an interest in health communication and participation. Up to 151 participants (18–80 years; 117 female) across 12 countries took part, including 48 consumers (patients, carers, consumer representatives) and 75 professionals (health professionals, policymakers, researchers) (plus 25 people who identified as both). Design Survey. Methods We invited people to submit their research ideas via an online survey open for 4 weeks. Using inductive thematic analysis, we generated priority research topics, then classified these into broader themes. Results Participants submitted 200 research ideas, which we grouped into 21 priority topics. Key research priorities included: insufficient consumer involvement in research (19 responses), ‘official’ health information is contradictory and hard to understand (18 responses), communication/coordination breakdowns in health services (15 responses), health information provision a low priority for health professionals (15 responses), insufficient eliciting of patient preferences (14 responses), health services poorly understand/implement patient-centred care (14 responses), lack of holistic care impacting healthcare quality and safety (13 responses) and inadequate consumer involvement in service design (11 responses). These priorities encompassed acute and community health settings, with implications for policy and research. Priority populations of interest included people from diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds, carers, and people with low educational attainment, or mental illness. Most frequently suggested interventions focused on training and cultural change activities for health services and health professionals. Conclusions Consumers and other stakeholders want research addressing structural and cultural challenges in health services (eg, lack of holistic, patient-centred, culturally safe care) and building health professionals’ communication skills. Solutions should be devised in partnership with consumers, and focus on the needs of vulnerable groups.
Synnot, A., Bragge, P., Lowe, D., Nunn, J. S., OSullivan, M., Horvat, L., Tong, A., Kay, D., Ghersi, D., McDonald, S., Poole, N., Bourke, N., Lannin, N., Vadasz, D., Oliver, S., Carey, K., Hill, S. J.
BMJ Publishing
2044-6055
20446055
shingle_title_1 Research priorities in health communication and participation: international survey of consumers and other stakeholders
shingle_title_2 Research priorities in health communication and participation: international survey of consumers and other stakeholders
shingle_title_3 Research priorities in health communication and participation: international survey of consumers and other stakeholders
shingle_title_4 Research priorities in health communication and participation: international survey of consumers and other stakeholders
timestamp 2025-06-30T23:34:46.134Z
titel Research priorities in health communication and participation: international survey of consumers and other stakeholders
titel_suche Research priorities in health communication and participation: international survey of consumers and other stakeholders
topic WW-YZ
uid ipn_articles_6253511