Search Results - (Author, Cooperation:Sharon)

Showing 1 - 20 results of 3,167, query time: 0.45s Refine Results
  1. 1
    Louis, Karen Seashore ; Kruse, Sharon D.
    Thousand Oaks : Corwin Press
    Published 1995
    Staff View Availability
    Person(s):
    Louis, Karen Seashore; Kruse, Sharon D.
    Type of Medium:
    Unknown
    Pages:
    261 S.
    ISBN:
    0803962533
    Recall This

    Printed Books
  2. 2
    Kane, Sharon
    Scottsdale : Holcomb Hathaway Publishers
    Published 2003
    Staff View Availability
    Person(s):
    Kane, Sharon
    Type of Medium:
    Unknown
    Pages:
    390 S.
    ISBN:
    1890871370
    Language:
    English
    Recall This

    Printed Books
  3. 3
    Lohr, Sharon L.
    Pacific Grove et al. : Duxbury Press
    Published 1999
    Staff View Availability
    Person(s):
    Lohr, Sharon L.
    Type of Medium:
    Unknown
    Pages:
    135 S.
    ISBN:
    0534353606
    Language:
    English
    Recall This

    Printed Books
  4. 4
    Borkowski, John G. ; Ramey, Sharon L. ; Bristol-Power, Marie
    Mahwah : L. Erlbaum
    Published 2002
    Staff View Availability
    Person(s):
    Borkowski, John G.; Ramey, Sharon L.; Bristol-Power, Marie
    Type of Medium:
    Unknown
    Pages:
    388 S.
    ISBN:
    0805838325
    Series Statement:
    Monographs in parenting series
    Language:
    English
    Recall This

    Printed Books
  5. 5
    Daniel, Ronald S. ; Daniel, Sharon Callaway ; Taylor, Ronald L.
    Fort Worth : Saunders College Publishing
    Published 1999
    Staff View Availability
    Person(s):
    Daniel, Ronald S.; Daniel, Sharon Callaway; Taylor, Ronald L.
    Type of Medium:
    Unknown
    Pages:
    415 S.
    ISBN:
    0030221145
    Recall This

    Printed Books
  6. 6
    Lohr, Sharon L.
    Pacific Grove : Duxbury Press
    Published 1999
    Staff View Availability
    Person(s):
    Lohr, Sharon L.
    Type of Medium:
    Unknown
    Pages:
    493 S.
    ISBN:
    0534253614
    Recall This

    Printed Books
  7. 7
    Kerrod, Robin ; Holgate, Sharon A.
    London [u.a.] : Dorling Kindersley
    Published 2002
    Staff View Availability
    Person(s):
    Kerrod, Robin; Holgate, Sharon A.
    Type of Medium:
    Unknown
    Pages:
    160 S.
    ISBN:
    3831003629
    Series Statement:
    Dorling Kindersley Erforschen und Verstehen
    Uniform Title:
    The Way Science Works
    Language:
    German
    Recall This

    Printed Books
  8. 8
    Cochran-Smith, Marilyn ; Feiman-Nemser, Sharon ; McIntyre, D. John
    New York : Routledge
    Published 2008
    Staff View Availability
    Person(s):
    Cochran-Smith, Marilyn; Feiman-Nemser, Sharon; McIntyre, D. John
    Type of Medium:
    Unknown
    Pages:
    1354 S.
    ISBN:
    978-0-8058-4777-2, 9780805847772, 0805847774
    Language:
    English
    Recall This

    Printed Books
  9. 9
    Staff View Fulltext
    Publication Date:
    2019-04-18
    Description:
    What role do the media play in the medicalization of sleep problems? This article, based on a British Academy funded project, uses qualitative textual analysis to examine representations of insomnia and snoring in a large representative sample of newspaper articles taken from the UK national press from the mid-1980s to the present day. Constructed as `common problems' in the population at large, insomnia and snoring we show are differentially located in terms of medicalizing—healthicizing discourses and debates. Our findings also suggest important differences in the gendered construction of these problems and in terms of tabloid and `broadsheet' newspaper coverage of these issues. Newspaper constructions of sleep, it is concluded, are complex, depending on both the `problem' and the paper in question.
    Keywords:
    insomnia; media; medicalization; press; snoring;
    Type:
    journal article, Zeitschriftenartikel

    SSOAR
  10. 10
    Walker, Sharon
    DEU
    Published 2016
    Staff View
    Publication Date:
    2018-07-27
    Description:
    The intention of this article is to invite readers to explore and understand how literature reviews can be conducted from a systemic and dialogical approach. After reading a paper by Montuori (2005), I considered how literature reviews could be situated systemically whereby connections and relatedness between people and ideas are identified. This opened up possibilities for me that were transformative, re-positioning a process that I had previously seen as positivist, to one which is connected to a systemic position (Barge, 2006). In this article, I discuss how I conduct literature reviews from a systemic position; each text speaking to the others as in conversation, identifying themes, connections and generating new knowledge. The concept of texts "speaking" to each other lends itself to a dialogical approach. I will discuss how the systemic, dialogical and ethical considerations should be made. (author's abstract)
    Hauptintention dieses Beitrages ist es, Lesende zu einem Verständnis von Literatur-Reviews aus einer systemischen und dialogischen Perspektive einzuladen: Angeregt durch die Lektüre eines Beitrags von Montuori (2005) beschäftigte ich mich damit, wie solche Reviews situiert und wie Bezüge zwischen Menschen und Ideen hergestellt werden könnten. Transformative Potenziale erschlossen sich mir, indem ich einen Prozess, den ich zuvor positivistisch gedacht hatte, systemisch re-positionierte (Barge 2006). In diesem Beitrag zeige ich, wie ich Literatur-Reviews aus einer solchen systemischen Perspektive durchführe: Die Texte "sprechen" miteinander wie in einem Gespräch, neue Themen und Bezüge werden identifiziert und es entsteht neues Wissen. Das Konzept "sprechender" Texte entlehne ich einem dialogischen Ansatz, und ich diskutiere, welche systemischen, dialogischen und ethischen Aspekte beachtet werden sollten. (Autorenmreferat)
    Keywords:
    Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie ; Social sciences, sociology, anthropology ; Literatur-Review; systemische Positionierung; systemische Praxis; systemisches Denken ; Forschungsarten der Sozialforschung ; Research Design ; Forschungsansatz ; Wissensproduktion ; research approach ; knowledge production
    Type:
    Zeitschriftenartikel, journal article

    SSOAR
  11. 11
    Staff View
    Publication Date:
    2018-07-27
    Description:
    In unserem Beitrag werden drei Studien beschrieben und unter dem Gesichtspunkt von Macht-Dynamiken beleuchtet, die durch die im Forschungsprozess wirksamen subjektiven Positionen von Forschenden und Forschungsteilnehmer(inne)n hervorgebracht werden. Der hierbei verwandte reflexive Ansatz ist durch poststrukturalistische Kritiken an einem Reflexivitätsbegriff inspiriert, der wahrheitsgemäße Repräsentationen des Forschungsprozesses und diesen gestaltende stabile und einzigartige Autor(inn)en unterstellt. Hier werden Subjektivität und Macht demgegenüber mit Hilfe der Verwendung unterschiedlicher narrativer Stile ausgelotet, um den widersprüchlichen und fragmentierten Charakter von Reflexivität als eine Neukonstruktion von (vergangener) Wirklichkeit darstellen zu können. In der ersten Studie, die sich mit der Erfahrung von Wut bei Frauen befasst, beschreibt eine Forscherin ihren Versuch, die Teilnehmerinnen der Studie in die Analyse einzubeziehen, um das eigene Verständnis der Daten zu verbessern. Ausgehend von einem Verständnis von Reflexivität als Introspektion und Kollaboration schildert eine einzelne Erzählerin die Geschichte ihre konflikthaften subjektiven Position als feministische Forscherin, d.h. als Feministin und Forscherin. In der zweiten Studie interviewte eine Forscherin berufstätige Männer zum Thema zwischengeschlechtlicher Beziehungen. Diese Forscherin entwickelt – ausgehend von einem Verständnis von Reflexivität als sozialer Kritik – eine dialogische Untersuchung in Form von "Mehrstimmigkeit". Ihre Aufmerksamkeit gilt im Besonderen eigenen subjektiven Positionen, die aus Identitätsaspekten folgen, die mit ihrer Geschlechtsrolle und ihrer Forscherinnenrolle verknüpft sind. In der dritten Studie schließlich wird Reflexivität als diskursive Dekonstruktion verstanden und ein Ansatz nicht-dialogischer "Mehrstimmigkeit" verwandt, um den multiplen und widersprüchlichen Charakter reflexiven Verstehens nachzuvollziehen, der mit aus Forschungserfahrung, Nationalität und Mutterschaft sich ergebenden subjektiven Positionen zusammenhängt. Bei der Untersuchung der Beziehungen zwischen Forscherinnen und Forschungsteilnehmer(inne)n, die dadurch ermöglicht oder verhindert wurden, dass die Forscherinnen ihre subjektive Rolle als "Forschende" einnahmen, entstanden durch die Verwendung von drei verschiedenen Auffassungsweisen von Reflexivität mit entsprechend unterschiedlichen Erzähl-Stilen neue Verstehensmöglichkeiten von Subjektivität und Macht.
    Three studies are described and examined in terms of the power dynamics created through the subjective positions made salient for both researchers and the participants by the research process. The reflexive accounts of these studies are informed by the poststructuralist critique of reflexivity as both a truthful representation of the research process and one that can be produced by stable and unitary authors. In this paper subjectivity and power are explored through the use of different narrative styles that work to highlight the contradictory and fragmented nature of reflexivity as a new construction of (a past) reality. In the first investigation a female researcher exploring women's experiences of anger describes the process of taking analysis back to her participants to enhance the researcher's understanding of her data. Taking the approach to reflexivity as one of introspection and collaboration a single narrator tells the tale of conflict and resolution between her subjective positions of feminist-researcher, feminist and researcher. In the second study, a female researcher who interviewed men working in professional employment creates a dialogical inquiry through polyvocality to produce an account of reflexivity as social critique. In particular, she explores the subjective positions created through identities attached to her gender and her role as a researcher. The third study approaches reflexivity as discursive deconstruction and employs non-dialogical polyvocality to explore the multiple and contradictory nature of reflexive understandings created through subjective positions derived from the research experience, nationality and motherhood. In examining the participant-researcher relationships that were enabled or dis-enabled when the researchers inhabited the subjective position of "researcher", the use of three different approaches to reflexivity with correspondingly different narrative styles, produced new understandings of subjectivity and power.
    Se describen y examinan tres estudios en términos de las dinámicas de poder creadas a través de las posiciones subjetivas hechas visibles para los investigadores y los investigados por el proceso de investigación. Los reportes reflexivos de estos estudios son guiados por la crítica post-estructuralista de la reflexividad como una representación verdadera del proceso investigativo y como una representación que puede ser producida por autores estables y unitarios. En este artículo subjetividad y poder son explorados por el uso de diferentes estilos narativos que tienen la funcción de demostrar la naturaleza contradictoria y fragmentada de la reflexividad como una nueva construcción de (una) realidad (pasada). En el primer estudio una investigadora que explora experiencias femininas de enojo describe el proceso de devolver el análisis a las participantes de su estudio para mejorar su propio entendimiento de sus datos. Tomando el enfoque a la reflexividad como único a la introspección y colaboración, un solo narrador cuenta la historia de conflicto y solución entre sus posiciones subjetivas de investigadora feminista, entre feminista y investigadora. En el segundo estudio una investigadora que entrevistó hombres trabajando en empleos profesionales, crea una investigación dialógica por polivocalidad para producir un reporte reflexivo como crítica social. En particular explora las posiciones subjetivas creadas por identidades vinculadas con su género y su rol como investigadora. El tercer estudio accesa la reflexividad como deconstrucción discursiva y usa polivocalidad no-dialógica para explorar la naturaleza múltiple y contradictoria de los entendimientos reflexivos creados mediante posiciones subjetivas derivadas de la experiencia investigativa, de la nacionalidad y de la maternidad. Al examinar las relaciones entre participantes y investigadores que fueron hechas posibles o im-posibles cuando los investigadores tomaron la posición subjetiva de "investigador", el uso de tres diferentes enfoques a la reflexividad con correspondientes estilos narativos diferentes, produjo nuevos entendimientos sobre la subjetividad y el poder.
    Keywords:
    Sociology & anthropology ; Social sciences, sociology, anthropology ; Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie ; Soziologie, Anthropologie ; sozialer Konstruktivismus; Wut; Kindererziehung; reflexivity; power; subjectivity; feminism; post structuralism; social constructionism; anger; childcare; masculinities; reflexividad; poder; subjetividad; feminismo; post estructuralismo; construccionismo social; género; enojo; cuidado de niños; masculinidades; ; Forschungsarten der Sozialforschung ; Wissenschaftssoziologie, Wissenschaftsforschung, Technikforschung, Techniksoziologie ; Sociology of Science, Sociology of Technology, Research on Science and Technology ; Research Design ; scientist ; constructivism ; gender ; research topic ; reflexivity ; power ; subjectivity ; research project ; gender-specific factors ; feminism ; post-structuralism ; masculinity ; Macht ; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren ; Gender ; Forschungsprojekt ; Forschungsgegenstand ; Subjektivität ; Wissenschaftler ; Feminismus ; Konstruktivismus ; Männlichkeit ; Poststrukturalismus ; Reflexivität ; descriptive study ; basic research ; epistemological ; Grundlagenforschung ; wissenschaftstheoretisch ; deskriptive Studie
    Type:
    journal article, Zeitschriftenartikel

    SSOAR
  12. 12
    Elhadad, Sharon ; Sommer, Udi
    POL
    Published 2022
    Staff View
    Publication Date:
    2022-08-15
    Description:
    This paper develops a unified model of policy diffusion to analyze the speed of adoption of statewide lockdown policies within a federal system during the COVID-19 pandemic. The modified unified model was built to improve our understanding of policy diffusion in contexts where existing models fall short. The authors highlight three main policy diffusion channels: regional, vertical, and internal. The paper shows the empirical test of the model across US states and finds that vertical effects, such as higher approval ratings for President Donald Trump, as well as a comparatively high proportion of COVID-19 federal funding support, bear a strong positive association with the speed of statewide lockdown adoption policies. In addition, certain internal effects are also important - higher governor approval ratings are positively associated with the speed of statewide lockdown adoption policies, as are state and local spending, democratic state governments, and population awareness of the virus. However, other internal factors, such as the stringency of statewide lockdown policies and the relative proportion of COVID-19 deaths in a state, were minimally associated with the speed of lockdown policy adoption. Surprisingly, unlike past studies, horizontal regional effects did not play a significant role in the presented analysis - the speed of adoption of lockdown policies by neighboring states bears no association with the speed of policy adoption of statewide lockdowns. Overall, the results suggest a strong influence of political factors on the speed of statewide lockdown adoption policies in the US.
    Keywords:
    Staatsformen und Regierungssysteme ; Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie ; Systems of governments & states ; Social sciences, sociology, anthropology ; COVID-19; Corona pandemic; policy diffusion; policy styles ; Staat, staatliche Organisationsformen ; Gesundheitspolitik ; Political System, Constitution, Government ; Health Policy ; USA ; Föderalismus ; Krisenmanagement ; United States of America ; federalism ; crisis management (econ., pol.) ; health policy
    Type:
    Zeitschriftenartikel, journal article

    SSOAR
  13. 13
    Staff View Fulltext
    Publication Date:
    2021-10-08
    Description:
    Purpose: The tourism industry needs to identify potential tourists' planned behavior after COVID-19 and prepare accordingly. This study was conducted in Israel during the initial outbreak of COVID-19. This research focused on different types of precautionary measures used by the tourists and how perceived risk of getting sick with COVID-19 while traveling abroad as well as risk perceptions and attitudes about travel abroad might affect tourists’ intentions to adopt precautionary measures when planning future travel abroad. Methods: This research is based on an online survey questionnaire distributed during March 2020 among four hundred and six Israeli participants. Results: The analytical model show that people’s with higher levels of attitudes toward traveling abroad and those that prefer to avoid destinations with higher levels of attitudes toward traveling abroad and those that prefer to avoid travel to destinations with various risks had higher intentions to take precautionary measures while traveling abroad. Implications: The results of the current research can assist the tourism industry understand what precautionary measures are important to potential travellers and what health safety assurances the industry must provide to facilitate its recovery in the near future.
    Keywords:
    Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie ; Social sciences, sociology, anthropology ; COVID-19; Coronavirus ; Freizeitforschung, Freizeitsoziologie ; Leisure Research ; Tourismus ; Fernreise ; Epidemie ; Gesundheitsverhalten ; Gesundheitsvorsorge ; Prophylaxe ; tourism ; long-distance travel ; epidemic ; health behavior ; health care ; prophylaxis ; 20400 ; 40200
    Type:
    Zeitschriftenartikel, journal article

    SSOAR
  14. 14
    Breznau, Nate ; Rinke, Eike Mark ; Wuttke, Alexander ; Nguyen, Hung H. V. ; Adem, Muna ; Adriaans, Jule ; Alvarez-Benjumea, Amalia ; Andersen, Henrik K. ; Auer, Daniel ; Azevedo, Flavio ; Bahnsen, Oke ; Balzer, Dave ; Bauer, Gerrit ; Bauer, Paul C. ; Baumann, Markus ; Baute, Sharon ; Benoit, Verena ; Bernauer, Julian ; Berning, Carl ; Berthold, Anna ; Bethke, Felix S. ; Biegert, Thomas ; Blinzler, Katharina ; Blumenberg, Johannes N. ; Bobzien, Licia ; Bohman, Andrea ; Bol, Thijs ; Bostic, Amie ; Brzozowska, Zuzanna ; Burgdorf, Katharina ; Burger, Kaspar ; Busch, Kathrin B. ; Carlos-Castillo, Juan ; Chan, Nathan ; Christmann, Pablo ; Connelly, Roxanne ; Czymara, Christian S. ; Damian, Elena ; Ecker, Alejandro ; Edelmann, Achim ; Eger, Maureen A. ; Ellerbrock, Simon ; Forke, Anna ; Forster, Andrea ; Gaasendam, Chris ; Gavras, Konstantin ; Gayle, Vernon ; Gessler, Theresa ; Gnambs, Timo ; Godefroidt, Amélie ; Grömping, Max ; Groß, Martin ; Gruber, Stefan ; Gummer, Tobias ; Hadjar, Andreas ; Heisig, Jan Paul ; Hellmeier, Sebastian ; Heyne, Stefanie ; Hirsch, Magdalena ; Hjerm, Mikael ; Hochman, Oshrat ; Hövermann, Andreas ; Hunger, Sophia ; Hunkler, Christian ; Huth, Nora ; Ignácz, Zsófia S. ; Jacobs, Laura ; Jacobsen, Jannes ; Jaeger, Bastian ; Jungkunz, Sebastian ; Jungmann, Nils ; Kauff, Mathias ; Kleinert, Manuel ; Klinger, Julia ; Kolb, Jan-Philipp ; Kołczyńska, Marta ; Kuk, John ; Kunißen, Katharina ; Kurti Sinatra, Dafina ; Langenkamp, Alexander ; Lersch, Philipp M. ; Löbel, Lea-Maria ; Lutscher, Philipp ; Mader, Matthias ; Madia, Joan E. ; Malancu, Natalia ; Maldonado, Luis ; Marahrens, Helge ; Martin, Nicole ; Martinez, Paul ; Mayerl, Jochen ; Mayorga, Oscar J. ; McManus, Patricia ; McWagner, Kyle ; Meeusen, Cecil ; Meierrieks, Daniel ; Mellon, Jonathan ; Merhout, Friedolin ; Merk, Samuel ; Meyer, Daniel ; Micheli, Leticia ; Mijs, Jonathan ; Moya, Cristóbal ; Neunhoeffer, Marcel ; Nüst, Daniel ; Nygård, Olav ; Ochsenfeld, Fabian ; Otte, Gunnar ; Pechenkina, Anna O. ; Prosser, Christopher ; Raes, Louis ; Ralston, Kevin ; Ramos, Miguel R. ; Roets, Arne ; Rogers, Jonathan ; Ropers, Guido ; Samuel, Robin ; Sand, Gregor ; Schachter, Ariela ; Schaeffer, Merlin ; Schieferdecker, David ; Schlueter, Elmar ; Schmidt, Regine ; Schmidt, Katja M. ; Schmidt-Catran, Alexander ; Schmiedeberg, Claudia ; Schneider, Jürgen ; Schoonvelde, Martijn ; Schulte-Cloos, Julia ; Schumann, Sandy ; Schunck, Reinhard ; Schupp, Jürgen ; Seuring, Julian ; Silber, Henning ; Sleegers, Willem ; Sonntag, Nico ; Staudt, Alexander ; Steiber, Nadia ; Steiner, Nils ; Sternberg, Sebastian ; Stiers, Dieter ; Stojmenovska, Dragana ; Storz, Nora ; Striessnig, Erich ; Stroppe, Anne-Kathrin ; Teltemann, Janna ; Tibajev, Andrey ; Tung, Brian ; Vagni, Giacomo ; Van Assche, Jasper ; Linden, Meta van der ; Noll, Jolanda van der ; Van Hootegem, Arno ; Vogtenhuber, Stefan ; Voicu, Bogdan ; Wagemans, Fieke ; Wehl, Nadja ; Werner, Hannah ; Wiernik, Brenton M. ; Winter, Fabian ; Wolf, Christof ; Yamada, Yuki ; Zhang, Nan ; Ziller, Conrad ; Zins, Stefan ; Żółtak, Tomasz
    USA
    Published 2023
    Staff View Fulltext
    Publication Date:
    2025-04-09
    Description:
    This study explores how researchers’ analytical choices affect the reliability of scientific findings. Most discussions of reliability problems in science focus on systematic biases. We broaden the lens to emphasize the idiosyncrasy of conscious and unconscious decisions that researchers make during data analysis. We coordinated 161 researchers in 73 research teams and observed their research decisions as they used the same data to independently test the same prominent social science hypothesis: that greater immigration reduces support for social policies among the public. In this typical case of social science research, research teams reported both widely diverging numerical findings and substantive conclusions despite identical start conditions. Researchers’ expertise, prior beliefs, and expectations barely predict the wide variation in research outcomes. More than 95% of the total variance in numerical results remains unexplained even after qualitative coding of all identifiable decisions in each team’s workflow. This reveals a universe of uncertainty that remains hidden when considering a single study in isolation. The idiosyncratic nature of how researchers’ results and conclusions varied is a previously underappreciated explanation for why many scientific hypotheses remain contested. These results call for greater epistemic humility and clarity in reporting scientific findings.
    Keywords:
    Soziologie, Anthropologie ; Politikwissenschaft ; Sociology & anthropology ; Political science ; analytical flexibility; immigration and policy preferences; many analysts; metascience; researcher degrees of freedom; ISSP 1985; ISSP 1990; ISSP 1996; ISSP 2006; ISSP 2016 ; Wissenschaftssoziologie, Wissenschaftsforschung, Technikforschung, Techniksoziologie ; politische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kultur ; Sociology of Science, Sociology of Technology, Research on Science and Technology ; Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture ; ISSP ; Daten ; Hypothese ; Forschungsprozess ; Analyse ; Migration ; politische Einstellung ; Wissenschaftler ; data ; hypothesis ; research process ; analysis ; migration ; political attitude ; scientist
    Type:
    Zeitschriftenartikel, journal article

    SSOAR
  15. 15
    Bong, Sharon A.
    DEU
    Published 2010
    Staff View
    Publication Date:
    2018-07-27
    Description:
    In der Entscheidungsphase für ein CAQDAS-Programm ("Computer Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software") im Rahmen meines Forschungsprojektes über die Bedeutung von Kultur und Religion für die Menschenrechte von Frauen in Malaysia habe ich mir zum einen Gedanken über die Dominanz der gegenstandsbezogenen Theoriebildung (Grounded Theory) und zum anderen über die Dominanz des Kodierens als Methode gemacht. Im ersten Teil des Aufsatzes diskutiere ich, inwieweit meine Forschung auf den Prinzipien und Praktiken der Grounded Theory (GT) aufbaut bzw. aufgrund meines hypothesengeleiteten Rahmenkonzepts und der Auswahlkriterien für Untersuchungsteilnehmer(innen) davon abweicht. Ich zeige, in welcher Weise die Anwendung der GT zur Verbesserung des qualitativen Forschungsprozesses im Rahmen meiner Arbeit beigetragen hat. Dabei ist ein Ziel, den paradigmatischen Status der GT im Zusammenhang mit CAQDAS und die damit verbundene Homogenisierung zu entmystifizieren. Im zweiten Teil des Aufsatzes wird die Problematik des Kodierens als Analysemethode behandelt, und es wird gezeigt, wie diese mittels Reflexivität und "Agency" (Selbstbestimmung) des Forschers/der Forscherin bewältigt werden kann. Hierbei stehen eine pragmatische Herangehensweise und die Anwendung von Kodes als Mittel zum Zweck – und nicht als eigentliches Ziel – im Vordergrund. Abschließend wird die Frage erörtert, ob CAQDAS die Güte der qualitativen Datenanalyse und die Transparenz der Methode erhöht, (z.B. durch die Verwendung eines Audittrails) und somit zu einer nachvollziehbaren, innovativen und effektiven Forschung beiträgt.
    In deciding on CAQDAS use in my research, I deliberate firstly the primacy of grounded theory as a methodology and secondly the primacy of coding as a method. In the first section of this paper, I weigh the extent to which my research draws and departs from the principles and practices of grounded theory (GT). In examining the impact of cultures and religions on women's human rights in Malaysia I have used for example hypothesis-guided criteria for sampling. This is strictly speaking not in the original sense a grounded theory approach. In the paper, I make transparent the extent to which GT has informed my work in enhancing the qualitative research and in highlighting the uses and limits of grounded theory, I pose the question to what extent have I de-mystified its paradigmatic status in CAQDAS and its homogenising effects. In the second section, I discuss the dominance of coding in qualitative data analysis and I argue that the pitfall of reifying coding as analyses can be avoided through a researcher's reflexivity and agency (self-determination) combined with a pragmatic view and the use of codes as a means and not as an end. I discuss whether CAQDAS use essentially facilitates the rigour of methodology and the transparency of method as for example manifested in one's audit trail, and whether this in turn constitute research that is more accountable, innovative and effective.
    Al decidir el uso del CAQDAS en mi investigación, que considera el impacto de la cultura y religión en los derechos humanos de las mujeres en Malasia, he reflexionado sobre la primacía de la "teorización enraizada" ("grounded theory") como metodología y la primacía de codificación como método. En la primera sección del capítulo, considero en qué medida mi investigación se aproxima o hasta de la práctica de la "teorización enraizada", especialmente por medio de hipótesis-guía y criterio de amostrage. Se hace transparente la extensión en la cual la teorización enraizada informó mi trabajo al aprimorar (acelerar?) la investigación cualitativa. También apunto los usos y límites de la "teorización enraizada", indagando hasta qué punto yo he desmitificado su status paradigmático dentro del CAQDAS así como su efecto de homogeneización. En la segunda sección, argumento que los problemas de reificación de la codificación como análisis puede ser evitado a través de la reflexión y auto-determinación del investigador, por medio de su visión pragmática y del uso del código como un medio y no un fin en si mismo. Concluyo con la pregunta si el uso del CAQDAS facilita el rigor metodológico y la transparencia del método como se manifiesta en una disposición honesta sobre la cual constituir una investigación responsable, innovativa y efectiva.
    Keywords:
    CAQDAS; qualitative Forschung; Tiefeninterviews; Sampling; gegenstandsbezogene Theoriebildung; Kodieren; CAQDAS; qualitative research; in-depth interviewing; sampling; coding; CAQDAS; investigación cualitativa; entrevista en-profundidad; muestra; teorización enraizada; codificación; ; Grounded Theory ; grounded theory
    Type:
    journal article, Zeitschriftenartikel

    SSOAR
  16. 16
    Staff View Fulltext
    Publication Date:
    2018-07-26
    Description:
    How do laypeople perceive uncertainties about environmental health risks? How do risk-related cognitions and emotions influence these uncertainties, and what roles do sociodemographic and contextual factors, risk judgments, and information exposures play? This study explores these questions using secondary analyses of survey data. Results suggest that uncertainty reflects individual-level emotions and cognitions, but may also be shaped by a variety of social and contextual factors. Emotions (worry and anger) are strongly associated with perceived uncertainty, and perceived lack of knowledge and perceived likelihood of becoming ill are weakly associated with it. Several demographic variables, information exposures, and risk judgment variables affect perceived uncertainty indirectly, primarily through perceived knowledge and emotions. These findings raise a variety of questions about the complex and dynamic interactions among risk contexts, socioeconomic factors, communication processes, perceived knowledge, emotions, and perceived uncertainties about risks.
    Type:
    journal article, Zeitschriftenartikel

    SSOAR
  17. 17
    Staff View
    Publication Date:
    2018-07-27
    Description:
    When Marshall McLUHAN famously stated "the medium is the message," he was echoing Martin HEIDEGGER's assertion that through our use of technology we can become functions of it. Therefore, how does adopting computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software affect our research activities and, more importantly, our conception of research? These questions are explored by examining the influence NVivo had upon an interdisciplinary phenomenological research project in health ethics. We identify the software's effects and situate our decision to use it within the Canadian health sciences research landscape. We also explore the challenges of remaining true to our project's philosophical foundations, as well as how NVivo altered our being-in-the-world as researchers. This case demonstrates McLUHAN's claim that new technologies invariably initiate new practices and modes of being, and urges researchers to attend to how we are both shaping and being shaped by software.
    Cuando Marshall McLUHAN afirmo "El medio es el mensaje" estaba haciendo eco a la afirmación de Martín HEIDEGGER de que a través de nuestro uso de la tecnología podemos convertirnos en funciones de ello. Por consiguiente, ¿Cómo afecta el análisis cualitativo de datos con asistencia de una computadora nuestras actividades de investigación y aún más importante, nuestra concepción de la investigación? Se exploran estas preguntas al examinar la influencia que NVivo tuvo sobre un proyecto de investigación fenomenológica interdisciplinaria en ética de salud. Identificamos los efectos del software y situamos nuestra decisión de usarlo en el horizonte de la investigación de ciencias de la salud canadienses. Exploramos los desafíos de mantenernos fieles a los fundamentos filosóficos del proyecto, así como también la forma en que NVivo alteró nuestro ser-en-el-mundo como investigadores. Este caso demuestra la afirmación de McLUHAN sobre que invariablemente las nuevas tecnologías inician nuevas prácticas y modos de ser, y urge a que los investigadores pongan atención sobre como forman, a la vez que se van formando, por el software.
    Als Marshall McLUHAN seinen berühmten Satz "Das Medium ist die Botschaft" formulierte, fand sich eine ähnliche Vorstellung in Martin HEIDEGGERs Behauptung, dass wir durch die Nutzung von Technologie zu deren Teil werden. Unsere Frage ist – von hier ausgehend – in welcher Weise die Nutzung computergestützter qualitativer Analyse-Software unsere Forschungsaktivitäten affiziert und - noch zentraler – unser Konzept von Forschung? Zu deren Beantwortung haben wir uns mit dem Einfluss von NVivo auf ein interdisziplinäres phänomenologisches Forschungsprojekt befasst, das in der Gesundheitsethik angesiedelt ist. Wir identifizieren die Effekte der Software auf unsere Forschung, indem wir bereits unsere Entscheidung für ihre Nutzung in dem aktuellen Stand der kanadischen Gesundheitswissenschaften situieren. Wir befassen uns auch mit der Herausforderung, den philosophischen Grundlagen unserer Forschung treu zu bleiben und mit der Frage, wie NVivo unser "In-der-Welt-sein" als Forschende verändert hat. Unser Beispiel zeigt, McLUHAN folgend, dass neue Technologien notwendig neue Praktiken und Seinsweisen hervorbringen, und es verweist Forschende darauf zu reflektieren, wie Software für Forschungsarbeiten angepasst wird und wie sie umgekehrt uns selbst "anpasst".
    Keywords:
    Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie ; Social sciences, sociology, anthropology ; health sciences; health ethics; media and communication; technology studies; computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software; NVivo; hermeneutic phenomenology; qualitative health science research; technology; análisis cualitativo de datos asistidos por la computadora; fenomenológica hermenéutica; investigación científica cualitativa en salud; tecnología; computergestützte qualitative Analyse-Software; hermeneutische Phänomenologie ; Forschungsarten der Sozialforschung ; Erhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaften ; Methods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methods ; Research Design ; Forschungsprozess ; Gesundheitswissenschaft ; neue Technologie ; Software ; Analyseverfahren ; Phänomenologie ; Hermeneutik ; qualitative Methode ; Analyse ; Daten ; phenomenology ; health science ; data ; qualitative method ; analysis ; software ; new technology ; analysis procedure ; research process ; hermeneutics ; descriptive study ; deskriptive Studie
    Type:
    journal article, Zeitschriftenartikel

    SSOAR
  18. 18
    Bong, Sharon A.
    DEU
    Published 2012
    Staff View Fulltext
    Publication Date:
    2018-10-25
    Description:
    'The author deliberates firstly the primacy of grounded theory as a methodology and secondly the primacy of grounded theory coding as a method in deciding on CAQDAS use in his research. In the first section of this paper, the author weighs the extent to which his research draws and departs from the principles and practices of grounded theory methodology (GTM). In examining the impact of cultures and religions on women's human rights in Malaysia the author has used for example hypothesis-guided criteria for sampling. This is strictly speaking not in the original sense a grounded theory approach. In the paper, the author makes transparent the extent to which GTM has informed his work in enhancing the qualitative research and in highlighting the uses and limits of GTM, the author poses the question to what extent has the author demystified its paradigmatic status in CAQDAS and its homogenising effects. In the second section, the author discusses the dominance of coding in qualitative data analysis and the author argues that the pitfall of reifying coding as analyses can be avoided through a researcher's reflexivity and agency (self-determination) combined with a pragmatic view and the use of codes as a means and not as an end, essentially, grounded theory coding. The author discusses whether CAQDAS use as a tool facilitates the rigour of GTM and the transparency of grounded theory coding as method as manifested in one's audit trail, and whether this in turn constitute research that is more accountable, innovative and effective.' (author's abstract)|
    Keywords:
    Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie ; Social sciences, sociology, anthropology ; Forschungsarten der Sozialforschung ; Research Design ; Grounded Theory ; Codierung ; qualitative Methode ; Methodologie ; Stichprobe ; Methode ; methodology ; sample ; grounded theory ; qualitative method ; method ; coding ; Grundlagenforschung ; basic research
    Type:
    journal article, Zeitschriftenartikel

    SSOAR
  19. 19
    Marcus, Sharon
    MISC
    Published 2010
    Staff View Fulltext
    Publication Date:
    2018-07-27
    Description:
    The article investigates the practice of female marriages in 19th century Great Britain and United States and argues that female marriages provided model for more progressive forms of the legal marriage between men and women. Unlike homosexuality in the 20th century, the same-sex relationships between women in the 19th century often enjoyed social recognition and some women in female marriages occupied prominent social positions. Because they were considered to rest on contract, female marriages served as inspiration for the contractual view of marriage advocated by many supporters of the Victorian marriage reform. The contribution of women in female couples to the success of the marriage reform was further underlined by their belonging to influential social networks. The author also argues that while the structuralist anthropology of mid-20th century, represented through the work of Claude Lévi-Strauss, had limited understanding of homosexuality as a socially legitimate phenomenon, the Victorian anthropology of the second half of the 19th century was relatively more open regarding the same-sex relationships. It is contended that authors as diverse as Henry Maine, Johann Bachofen, or Frederick Engels provided impulses in their work both for a positive evaluation of the same-sex relationships and for a more egalitarian understanding of marriage.
    Keywords:
    Sociology & anthropology ; Social sciences, sociology, anthropology ; History ; Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie ; Geschichte ; Soziologie, Anthropologie ; female marriages ; social history of marriage ; GLBT studies ; Victorian studies ; social anthropology – history of ; Ethnologie, Kulturanthropologie, Ethnosoziologie ; Familiensoziologie, Sexualsoziologie ; Sozialgeschichte, historische Sozialforschung ; Family Sociology, Sociology of Sexual Behavior ; Social History, Historical Social Research ; Ethnology, Cultural Anthropology, Ethnosociology
    Type:
    journal article, Zeitschriftenartikel

    SSOAR
  20. 20
    Bäcker, Sharon
    DEU
    Published 2014
    Staff View Fulltext
    Publication Date:
    2018-10-08
    Keywords:
    Social problems and services ; Sociology & anthropology ; Soziale Probleme und Sozialdienste ; Soziologie, Anthropologie ; Jugendsoziologie, Soziologie der Kindheit ; soziale Probleme ; Sociology of the Youth, Sociology of Childhood ; Social Problems ; Jugendlicher ; Gewalt ; Gewaltbereitschaft ; Gewaltkriminalität ; Ursachenforschung ; abweichendes Verhalten ; Handlungsorientierung ; sozialer Status ; soziale Anerkennung ; Sozialisation ; Motivation ; adolescent ; violence ; propensity to violence ; violent crime ; etiology ; deviant behavior ; action orientation ; social status ; social recognition ; socialization ; motivation
    Type:
    Rezension, review

    SSOAR