Search Results - (Author, Cooperation:M. A. Gillespie)
-
1Latest Papers from Table of Contents or Articles in PressM. Baude ; W. E. Kunin ; N. D. Boatman ; S. Conyers ; N. Davies ; M. A. Gillespie ; R. D. Morton ; S. M. Smart ; J. Memmott
Nature Publishing Group (NPG)
Published 2016Staff ViewPublication Date: 2016-02-06Publisher: Nature Publishing Group (NPG)Print ISSN: 0028-0836Electronic ISSN: 1476-4687Topics: BiologyChemistry and PharmacologyMedicineNatural Sciences in GeneralPhysicsKeywords: Animals ; *Biodiversity ; Flowers/*chemistry/classification/*growth & development ; Grassland ; Great Britain ; Insects/physiology ; Medicago/chemistry/growth & development ; Plant Nectar/*analysis ; Plants/*chemistry/*classification/metabolism ; Pollination ; Species SpecificityPublished by: -
2Articles: DFG German National LicensesSchmitt, N. ; Oswald, F. L. ; Kim, B. H. ; Gillespie, M. A. ; Ramsay, L. J.
Oxford, UK and Boston, USA : Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Published 2004Staff ViewISSN: 1468-2389Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005Topics: EconomicsNotes: Reactions to the use of the ACT/SAT, biodata, and situational judgment measures in college admissions decisions were collected from 644 college freshmen. Evaluation of a series of models of fairness perceptions indicated that self-serving bias and organizational justice explanations may both be responsible for these reactions. Examination of respondents' beliefs about their performance compared with other students' performance also elicited responses that may be attributable to concerns about distributive justice. A variety of perceptual processes may explain fairness perceptions, but from a practical perspective, it may be easiest to manipulate examinees' perceptions of the relevance, and indirectly, the perceived fairness of the selection procedures used to make major selection or admissions decisions.Type of Medium: Electronic ResourceURL: