Search Results - (Author, Cooperation:D. Doherty)
-
1Lee, E. Q., Duda, D. G., Muzikansky, A., Gerstner, E. R., Kuhn, J. G., Reardon, D. A., Nayak, L., Norden, A. D., Doherty, L., La; Frankie, D., Stefanik, J., Vardam, T., Smith, K. H., McCluskey, C., Gaffey, S., Batchelor, T. T., Jain, R. K., Wen, P. Y.
The American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Published 2018Staff ViewPublication Date: 2018-10-02Publisher: The American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)Print ISSN: 1078-0432Electronic ISSN: 1557-3265Topics: MedicinePublished by: -
2B. J. O'Roak ; L. Vives ; W. Fu ; J. D. Egertson ; I. B. Stanaway ; I. G. Phelps ; G. Carvill ; A. Kumar ; C. Lee ; K. Ankenman ; J. Munson ; J. B. Hiatt ; E. H. Turner ; R. Levy ; D. R. O'Day ; N. Krumm ; B. P. Coe ; B. K. Martin ; E. Borenstein ; D. A. Nickerson ; H. C. Mefford ; D. Doherty ; J. M. Akey ; R. Bernier ; E. E. Eichler ; J. Shendure
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Published 2012Staff ViewPublication Date: 2012-11-20Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)Print ISSN: 0036-8075Electronic ISSN: 1095-9203Topics: BiologyChemistry and PharmacologyComputer ScienceMedicineNatural Sciences in GeneralPhysicsKeywords: Cephalometry ; Child ; Child Development Disorders, Pervasive/*genetics ; Child, Preschool ; Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly ; Cohort Studies ; DNA Probes ; DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics ; Exome ; Female ; *Genetic Association Studies ; Genetic Predisposition to Disease ; Humans ; Male ; Megalencephaly/genetics ; Microcephaly/genetics ; *Mutation ; Nuclear Proteins/genetics ; PTEN Phosphohydrolase/genetics ; Protein-Serine-Threonine Kinases/genetics ; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/genetics ; Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear/genetics ; Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate/genetics ; Repressor Proteins/genetics ; Sequence Analysis, DNA/*methods ; T-Box Domain Proteins/genetics ; Transcription Factors/genetics ; beta Catenin/genetics/metabolismPublished by: -
3Paech, M. J. ; Lim, C. B. ; Banks, S. L. ; Rucklidge, M. W. M. ; Doherty, D. A.
Oxford, UK : Blackwell Science Ltd
Published 2003Staff ViewISSN: 1365-2044Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005Topics: MedicineNotes: Twenty-four gynaecological patients receiving postoperative patient-controlled analgesia were enrolled in an open cross-over pilot study evaluating two new formulations of nasal fentanyl spray. The primary outcome was the bioavailability of nasal fentanyl in comparison with intravenous fentanyl. This manuscript describes the clinical outcomes of quality of postoperative analgesia and patient acceptability. There were 21 complete data sets for both sequences of the cross-over design. In randomised order, patients received approximately 50 μg of fentanyl in a single dose by intranasal and intravenous administration, but separated by at least 2 h. Analgesia was of rapid onset (within 5 min) and similar quality. There was no significant difference in side-effects. Four patients experienced mild nasal stinging and although 10 (42%) preferred intravenous administration, seven (29%) preferred intranasal and six (25%) had no preference. We conclude that these formulations of fentanyl, delivered as nasal spray, have potential clinical utility.Type of Medium: Electronic ResourceURL: -
4Staff View
ISSN: 0023-9690Source: Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002Topics: EducationPsychologyType of Medium: Electronic ResourceURL: -
5Paech, M. J. ; Tweedie, O. ; Stannard, K. ; Hepp, M. ; Dodd, P. ; Daly, H. ; Bennett, E.-J. ; Millard, A. ; Doherty, D. A.
Oxford, UK : Blackwell Science Ltd
Published 2005Staff ViewISSN: 1365-2044Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005Topics: MedicineNotes: We performed a randomised, crossover, single-blind trial among 168 patients, to compare the single-use SoftSeal™ and LMA Unique™ laryngeal mask airways in spontaneously breathing adults. Size-3 and -4 laryngeal mask airways, inserted by experienced anaesthetists, performed equivalently for successful first-time placement (148 (91%) vs 155 (96%) for the SoftSeal™ and LMA Unique™, respectively). The SoftSeal™ was more often rated as difficult to insert (27 (17%) vs 4 (3%); p 〈 0.001) and was more likely to show evidence of mucosal trauma after the first insertion (14 (10%) vs 5 (4%); OR 1.3 (95% CI 1.3–11.3); p 〈 0.05). The fibreoptic view of the larynx was better through the SoftSeal™ (vocal cords not visible in 27 (17%) vs 44 (27%); p 〈 0.05) and it more frequently provided a ventilation seal at 20 cmH2O (93 (59%) vs 62 (39%); OR 2.15 (CI 1.44–3.21); p 〈 0.001). In contrast to the LMA Unique™, its cuff pressure did not increase during nitrous oxide anaesthesia (median (IQR [range]) decrease 3 (− 20–23 [-40–94]) cmH2O vs increase of 16 (−2–39 [−54–112]) cmH2O; p 〈 0.01). Both devices were equivalent for the success of first-time insertion and performed satisfactorily clinically. There were some performance differences, but either appears suitable for airway management in spontaneously breathing patients.Type of Medium: Electronic ResourceURL: -
6Staff View
ISSN: 0160-2527Source: Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002Topics: PsychologyLawType of Medium: Electronic ResourceURL: