Search Results - (Author, Cooperation:D. D. Barker)
-
1Latest Papers from Table of Contents or Articles in PressM. Fromer ; A. J. Pocklington ; D. H. Kavanagh ; H. J. Williams ; S. Dwyer ; P. Gormley ; L. Georgieva ; E. Rees ; P. Palta ; D. M. Ruderfer ; N. Carrera ; I. Humphreys ; J. S. Johnson ; P. Roussos ; D. D. Barker ; E. Banks ; V. Milanova ; S. G. Grant ; E. Hannon ; S. A. Rose ; K. Chambert ; M. Mahajan ; E. M. Scolnick ; J. L. Moran ; G. Kirov ; A. Palotie ; S. A. McCarroll ; P. Holmans ; P. Sklar ; M. J. Owen ; S. M. Purcell ; M. C. O'Donovan
Nature Publishing Group (NPG)
Published 2014Staff ViewPublication Date: 2014-01-28Publisher: Nature Publishing Group (NPG)Print ISSN: 0028-0836Electronic ISSN: 1476-4687Topics: BiologyChemistry and PharmacologyMedicineNatural Sciences in GeneralPhysicsKeywords: Child Development Disorders, Pervasive/genetics ; Cytoskeletal Proteins/metabolism ; Exome/genetics ; Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein/metabolism ; Humans ; Intellectual Disability/genetics ; *Models, Neurological ; Mutation/*genetics ; Mutation Rate ; Nerve Net/*metabolism/physiopathology ; Nerve Tissue Proteins/metabolism ; Neural Pathways/*metabolism/physiopathology ; Phenotype ; RNA, Messenger/genetics/metabolism ; Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate/metabolism ; Schizophrenia/*genetics/metabolism/*physiopathology ; Substrate Specificity ; Synapses/*metabolismPublished by: -
2Articles: DFG German National LicensesBarker, D. D. ; Whitney, M. G. ; Waclawczyk, J. H.
New York, NY [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell
Published 1993Staff ViewISSN: 1066-8527Keywords: Chemistry ; Chemical EngineeringSource: Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000Topics: Chemistry and PharmacologyProcess Engineering, Biotechnology, Nutrition TechnologyNotes: The majority of buildings located at petrochemical plants, exclusive of control rooms, are of conventional construction and do not explicitly provide for resistance to blast loads. Typical construction types include steel frame with metal cladding, concrete masonry unit, and brick clad with concrete or steel frame. These buildings are designed for conventional loads without regard for high overpressures and fragments resulting from an accidental explosion. Current regulatory trends are causing many companies to evaluate design standards for new and existing support structures especially in the wake of recent accidental explosions. Response criteria is an important part of these design standards especially when they are used to analyze existing structures for blast protection. Structural evaluations at several sites have revealed that few existing structures meet current design criteria primarily due to weak member connections. Previous work has shown that many conventional structures can develop a surprising degree of resistance to blast loading if proper detailing is used in design, thus allowing members to develop their full capacity. This paper discusses response criteria currently used for new structures and examines the problem of determining acceptance criteria for existing structures. Data from explosion accidents and test programs is reviewed to determine the degree of conservatism in current criteria. Finally, alternatives for establishing blast capacity of existing structures are discussed.Additional Material: 2 Ill.Type of Medium: Electronic ResourceURL: -
3Articles: DFG German National LicensesStaff View
ISSN: 0278-4513Keywords: Chemistry ; Chemical EngineeringSource: Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000Topics: Chemistry and PharmacologyProcess Engineering, Biotechnology, Nutrition TechnologyNotes: There has been a great deal of investment in development of design criteria and design and construction of heavily reinforced, blast-resistant control rooms. This remains the best option for protective construction against severe blast loading experienced close in to a vapor cloud or other explosion hazard. However, most structures encountered at chemical plants and contemplated for future construction are conventional steel frame, metal clad buildings. In this paper we look closely at the response of such buildings to explosion loads and their ability to undergo large deformations without structural failure. The types of structural elements evaluated include metal decking of various gauge and shape along with a variety of girt and purlin sections. Building frames or bents are also evaluated, although the date base for these is much more limited. The work is based on observations made during investigations of large explosion accidents along with analytical predictions and test measurements. To conclude, we offer specific design criteria and connection recommendations for enhancing the overall strength of a building through the use of conventional components in unconventional construction.Additional Material: 7 Ill.Type of Medium: Electronic ResourceURL: