Search Results - "Veterinary Ophthalmology"

Veterinary Ophthalmology, Wiley, Vol. 3, No. 1 ( 2000-03)

Online Resource

1463-5216, 1463-5224

English

Wiley

2000

2011043-1

22

Veterinary Ophthalmology, Wiley, Vol. 1, No. 4 ( 1998-01), p. 255-258

Online Resource

1463-5216, 1463-5224

English

Wiley

1998

2011043-1

22

Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, Elsevier BV, Vol. 12, No. 1 ( 1992-1), p. 40-

Online Resource

0737-0806

English

Elsevier BV

1992

2102631-2

22

Australian Veterinary Journal, Wiley, Vol. 77, No. 12 ( 1999-12), p. 790-790

Online Resource

0005-0423, 1751-0813

English

Wiley

1999

2101887-X

22

Nature, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 179, No. 4573 ( 1957-6), p. 1261-1262

Online Resource

0028-0836, 1476-4687

English

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

1957

120714-3

1413423-8

11

Veterinary Ophthalmology, Wiley, Vol. 3, No. 4 ( 2000-12)

Online Resource

1463-5216, 1463-5224

English

Wiley

2000

2011043-1

22

Veterinary Ophthalmology, Wiley, Vol. 3, No. 4 ( 2000-12), p. no-no

Online Resource

1463-5216

English

Wiley

2000

2011043-1

22

Veterinary Ophthalmology, Wiley, Vol. 10, No. 5 ( 2007-09), p. 323-335

Online Resource

1463-5216, 1463-5224

English

Wiley

2007

2011043-1

22

Veterinary Ophthalmology, Wiley, Vol. 8, No. 6 ( 2005-11), p. 427-436

Online Resource

1463-5216, 1463-5224

English

Wiley

2005

2011043-1

22

Veterinary Ophthalmology, Wiley, Vol. 25, No. S1 ( 2022-05), p. 5-16

In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) is a relatively new ocular imaging technique that permits morphological and quantitative assessment of the living cornea on the cellular level. The applications for IVCM in clinical ophthalmology are numerous and diverse. There are several advantages inherent to IVCM over standard diagnostic techniques currently used to confirm a diagnosis of infectious keratitis in veterinary ophthalmology. With IVCM, images can be viewed in real‐time providing immediate diagnostic information. Traumatic corneal sampling techniques are avoided, and the procedure can be repeated as frequently as is clinically indicated without risk of corneal tissue damage. Both superficial and deep corneal lesions can be evaluated by IVCM in an atraumatic fashion. Microorganism viability is not required for their detection and specialized diagnostic laboratory assay procedures are not necessary. Many larger infectious agents can be directly identified within corneal lesions by IVCM, including fungi and parasites such as Acanthamoeba spp. In other situations, such as bacterial infectious crystalline keratopathy, the biological systems associated with the microorganism can be detected within the cornea. The current resolution of IVCM is inadequate to directly visualize some corneal infectious agents, such as herpesviruses, but host responses and virus‐infected epithelial cells can be identified. This review summarizes the current knowledge and applications of IVCM in the management of infectious keratitis in veterinary ophthalmology, including its use in animals with bacterial, fungal, parasitic, and viral keratitis.

Online Resource

1463-5216, 1463-5224

English

Wiley

2022

2011043-1

22

Veterinary Ophthalmology, Wiley, Vol. 6, No. 4 ( 2003-12), p. 343-350

Online Resource

1463-5216, 1463-5224

English

Wiley

2003

2011043-1

22

Veterinary Ophthalmology, Wiley, Vol. 7, No. 6 ( 2004-11), p. 425-435

Online Resource

1463-5216, 1463-5224

English

Wiley

2004

2011043-1

22

Veterinary Ophthalmology, Wiley, Vol. 26, No. 4 ( 2023-07), p. 288-296

The aim of this study was to bibliometrically analyze the 100 most‐cited articles published in the Veterinary Ophthalmology (VO) journal. Methods Web of Science was searched for citations of VO articles published in 1998–2022. Tissue and species studied, and first and last author domicile and affiliation were recorded for the 100 most‐cited articles and descriptively analyzed. Results Altogether, the 100 most‐cited VO articles have cited a total of 5483 times. Most commonly, these were devoted to the cornea (23%), multiple tissues (19%), and glaucoma (16%). Studies on dogs (36%), horses (17%), and multiple species (15%) were most often cited. Most first/last authors were from the USA ( n  = 113), Brazil ( n  = 13), and France and Germany ( n  = 7 each), and most frequently affiliated with the University of Florida ( n  = 36), University of Wisconsin‐Madison ( n  = 15), and Animal Health Trust, North Carolina State University, and Ohio State University ( n  = 6 each). KN Gelatt ( n  = 9), DE Brooks ( n  = 6), and FJ Ollivier and EO MacKay ( n  = 5 each) were the most frequent first or last authors. The greatest number of citations was for articles with KN Gelatt ( n  = 555), FJ Ollivier ( n  = 411), and DE Brooks ( n  = 372) as first or last authors. “The comparative morphology of the tapetum lucidum” by FJ Ollivier et al. (2002) is the most frequently cited article in VO history ( n  = 178). Conclusions This study provides insight into the impact of publishing in VO and a more comprehensive understanding of trends and the most influential contributions to VO.

Online Resource

1463-5216, 1463-5224

English

Wiley

2023

2011043-1

22

Veterinary Ophthalmology, Wiley, Vol. 9, No. 6 ( 2006-11), p. 426-434

Online Resource

1463-5216, 1463-5224

English

Wiley

2006

2011043-1

22

Veterinary Ophthalmology, Wiley, Vol. 25, No. S1 ( 2022-05), p. 4-4

Online Resource

1463-5216, 1463-5224

English

Wiley

2022

2011043-1

22

Veterinary Ophthalmology, Wiley, Vol. 12, No. s1 ( 2009-11), p. 1-1

Online Resource

1463-5216, 1463-5224

English

Wiley

2009

2011043-1

22

Veterinary Ophthalmology, Wiley, Vol. 25, No. 1 ( 2022-01), p. 4-5

Online Resource

1463-5216, 1463-5224

English

Wiley

2022

2011043-1

22

Veterinary Ophthalmology, Wiley, Vol. 19, No. S1 ( 2016-07), p. 3-3

Online Resource

1463-5216, 1463-5224

English

Wiley

2016

2011043-1

22

Veterinary Ophthalmology, Wiley, Vol. 17, No. s1 ( 2014-07), p. 1-1

Online Resource

1463-5216, 1463-5224

English

Wiley

2014

2011043-1

22

Veterinary Ophthalmology, Wiley, Vol. 26, No. 5 ( 2023-09), p. 393-397

Assess the accuracy of abstracts in published veterinary ophthalmology articles. Procedures Abstracts and contents of 204 original research articles in veterinary ophthalmology published in seven peer‐reviewed journals between 2016–2020 were reviewed. Abstracts were considered inconsistent if they contained data that were either missing from or inconsistent with corresponding data in the article's body. Each abstract was graded between 0 (inaccurate) to 3 (accurate), and each inconsistency was subjectively classified as minor or major. The influence of selected variables was assessed: journal, impact factor, year of publication, number of words in abstract, study type (prospective/retrospective), and characteristics of the corresponding author [institution (academia/private practice), country of domicile (native/non‐native English), number of publications]. Results Most abstracts were accurate, with 1%, 4%, 9% and 86% receiving a score of 0, 1, 2 and 3, respectively. When detected, most inconsistencies were considered minor (77%). Although not statistically significant ( p  ≥ .130), the proportion of articles with a perfect score (=3) was higher in prospective (88%) vs. retrospective (81%) studies, academia (88%) vs. private practice (78%), and studies from corresponding authors domiciled in English (89%) vs. non‐English (83%) speaking countries. A significant but very weak ( r  = −0.15 to −0.19; p  ≤ .034) negative correlation was found between accuracy score and number of words, as well as 1‐year and 5‐year impact factors. Conclusions Although relatively uncommon, data in abstracts that are inconsistent or missing from the article's body do occur in veterinary ophthalmology articles, and could adversely influence a reader's interpretation of study findings.

Online Resource

1463-5216, 1463-5224

English

Wiley

2023

2011043-1

22